Which is why there is no list of Muhammed miracles recognized in Islam

Warners can give miracles and he could have done miracles later after they asked him.

Because it addresses people who said

""Why has a sign not been sent down to him from his Lord?""

He did in surah al najm and surah al Israa.

Those two surahs recount at least two instances he did miracles

Yes, at the time he did not do miracles when he asked. he did them LATER.

Dude, he even gave verses explaining why he wasn't giving miracles

Deuteronomy 31:18

**Deuteronomy 31:18 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<18> On that day I will surely hide my face on account of all the evil they have done by turning to other gods. ```

He doesnt say "later"

It does not have to say it.

Hmm, no child stabbing here

theres nothing anywhere deut 31:18 about murdering children

Numbers 31:18

**Numbers 31:18 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<18> But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves. ```

Then thereis Quran 17:59

Nor there

And nothing has prevented Us from sending signs except that the former peoples denied them. And We gave Thamud the she-camel as a visible sign, but they wronged her. And We send not the signs except as a warning.

when you read it in context its about God being mad with the israelites

Yes at the time of revelation of that verse, he was not given those miracles that Quraysh demanded. He was given them later as indicated in the above two passages I cited.

and in the numbers one he commands the young girls to be kept alive

Notice he doesnt deny that Mohammed raped Aisha

>300 accounts of fulfilled prophecy
>Doesn't matter
>A couple unsubstantiated maybe miracles but probably not
>Clearly reliable

Also being a warner does not really exclude him from giving miracles.

Then there is Quran 29:50-51

lmao

Dude, none of those verses say what you want them to say

Should have waited gor that

LEt me quote that last one

They say: “Why were Signs90 from his Lord not sent down upon him?” Say: “The Signs are only with Allah. As for me, I am no more than a plain warner." Does it not suffice for them (as a Sign) that We revealed to you the Book that is recited to them?91 Surely there is mercy and good counsel in it for those who believe.

It is clear he did no miracles

Did no prophecies, had no virtues, was promiscuous, broke his own rules, told people to die to amass wealth

Your book a shit dude, your 'prophet' was a weak con artist and child rapist who scammed his way into becoming a violent warlord

Being a warner does not exclude him from being a miracle-doer. Warners can do miracles as well. I gave examples of prophecies and miracles above. If you choose to stay blind about them and declare their non-existence, go ahead.

[Praise be to Allah Who enabled His slave, Muhammad, to make the journey at night from Masjid al-Haram in Makkah to Masjid al-Aqsa in Jerusalem, which is surrounded a blessed land.] (17:1)

It does, according to himself

Since miracles as for Allah, as he says

@SUPER MALE VITALITY™ The only child rapist I see is the God of the OT but okay.

>name once

And that is from the Quran itself

Yes, the prophet is a human so he does not have the intrisnsic capacity to do miracles neither does any prophet. God does them in their name