This is not just ceremony, because marriage is a sacrament, and what God binds, it is not for men to divide

except for Moses

So those authors who say that sexual immorality disolves marriage can go ********************

Mosaic law was replaced already wasn’t it?

Rather than replaced, it fulfilled its function

In a way, of course, it was replaced

Because it fulfilled its function

Yeah

ill be sure to tell that to
```4. Divorce and remarriage allowed.
a. For husband while adulterous wife lives: St. Basil, St. Epiphanius of Salamis, St. Augustine (at first said otherwise but changed his mind and then reverted back to first opinion), Tertullian, Ambrosiaster, St. Theodore of Canterbury, Council of Trullo, Council of Vannes 465, Council of Rome in 826.
b. For either innocent husband or wife in case of an adulterous spouse or other offense: Epiphanius of Salamis, ”Exceptions” of Egbert, Patriarch Alexis of Constantinople (addresses only the case of the woman).
c. For adulterous spouse after period of penance: St. Theodore of Canterbury.
d. Because marriage can be dissolved by adultery (insinuating remarriage could occur as the first one no longer exists): St. Cyril of Alexandria, St. Asterius of Amasea, St. Theodore of Canterbury, Lactanius, Hilary of Poitier.
e. After other spouse takes monastic vows: St. Theodore of Canterbury, Council of Compiegne,
f. For husband allowed while first wife lives due to first wife’s health: Pope Gregory II.
g. For husband if wife tries to kill him: Council of Verberie
h. For husband if stranded in a foreign land for good: Council of Verberie
```

And also observe

How in that very text you mention, the most popular position there is that

The remarriage is allowed only for the husband (probably because Paul mentions how a woman that separates must not remarry). And of course, implying that the same does not apply to men is foolish

"But Moses allowed us to divorce our wives"
"He did so because of your hard hearts. From the beginning the plan was one man, one woman, one inseparable flesh."

Paraphrasing obviously

and the hearts have softened much?

In cause you didn't notice, we aren't subject to the mosaic law

but the eternal one

Just saying they used the "but Moses" argument and Christ directly rebuked them for it

sure

the ideal is one man, one woman, forever

It's the only legitimate thing because of the nature of marriage

this ideal can be deviated from for extreme practical reasons tho as Moses demonstrates

<:bruh:569616839340982272>

so Moses and Israelites had no legitimate marriag

got it

I really wonder in how many heresies and perversions of scripture you are going to indulge, only to defend your nonsense

Because at this point, I think that even the priest of your parish would slap you

sure. and your church will continue to give out "annulments" like candy instead of just admiting its opersting in a fallen world and deal accordingly with it

Ok, then you admit you have a Church of the world

orthodox allow divorce and remarriage in extreme cases.

The World for you

God for me

lmao

Mormons are cool I guess. "We only practiced polygamy so all the woman had a man who could take care of them because of how extreme our situation was." Couldn't you take care of them without marrying? "Nah, impossible"

You should become catholic, you are filled with the spirit of V2

catholicism is what allows v2 to happen in the first place

a church filled with mental gymansts

If it were by you, we would have like V4 already

I mean it's better to be a mental gymnast than a mental couch potato

After all, we live in a fallen world, why not deal accordingly with the fact that other people beleive in other things? Or that homosexuality is accepted worldwide?

One thing is recognizing some people will do something