so why wasnt filioque added then and there

For the same reason that the whole second part of the Creed wasn't added until the second council

Because those parts are explicitely added as needed

my question was about filioque and why it was needed

Tell me, why is the Creed needed?

to combat heresies, such as arianism

Then for the same

which heresy

The heresy that the Holy Spirit does not proceed from the Son

The heresy that Theodore and Theodoret professed

lmao

In case you don't notice

The first quote is Theodoret against the 9th anathema

those were dealt with in con II

both theos

"Arianism" is just a fancy name for the heresy that the Son is not co-essential with the Father

Yeah, marking non Filioque as heresy

You agree with it even if you don’t add it to the creed

If you didn’t it’d be heresy

By all standards

Both orthodox and catholic

then why wasnt it added to the creed then and there

Because of that mistranslation of the word faith in greek

I swear, nigger, the petty excuses that you try to give to say something is not legitimate

Do you know why they didn't?

Because at that moment they didn't think about adding something to the Creed

“πίστιν”

hol up

"the entire second part was added to the creed at conII"

No, at con 1

The second ecumenical council

The 13th anathema was added at con II

In response to the heresies that arised

```For the same reason that the whole second part of the Creed wasn't added until the second council```

Yes, the second ecumenical council

ah

i thought you were that retarded for a second

had me fooled

ha

<:ohyou2:569616856105877505>

Consubstantiability can never be denied, otherwise it’s heresy