"Arianism" is just a fancy name for the heresy that the Son is not co-essential with the Father
Yeah, marking non Filioque as heresy
You agree with it even if you don’t add it to the creed
If you didn’t it’d be heresy
By all standards
Both orthodox and catholic
then why wasnt it added to the creed then and there
Because of that mistranslation of the word faith in greek
I swear, nigger, the petty excuses that you try to give to say something is not legitimate
Do you know why they didn't?
Because at that moment they didn't think about adding something to the Creed
“πίστιν”
hol up
"the entire second part was added to the creed at conII"
No, at con 1
The second ecumenical council
The 13th anathema was added at con II
In response to the heresies that arised
```For the same reason that the whole second part of the Creed wasn't added until the second council```
Yes, the second ecumenical council
ah
i thought you were that retarded for a second
had me fooled
ha
<:ohyou2:569616856105877505>
Consubstantiability can never be denied, otherwise it’s heresy
If you don’t like saying procedence it still doesn’t deny it
```Because of that mistranslation of the word faith in greek``` wow, so maybe the word implies or means different things in different languages
Creed can even mean faith in English
So you tell me
Faith can be taken as creed
Etc
so i decided to scroll up and see how we got here in the first place
Through autism of course
and of course it was mawlr trying to flex on orthos
<:bruh:569616839340982272>
ill say it once again. people in glass houses shouldnt throw stones
When we "flex on orthos", we refe to some things that some have developed, like this permisivity towards this and that. And we complain ten times as much about catholic clergy
some more questions. why do byzantine catholics like using the non filioque version of the creed 🤔
> If you don’t like saying procedence it still doesn’t deny it
Because for some cultural reason or so, they may have developed the habit to using that version
