yes

It’s not valid then

I knew there was discrepancies with this “law”

Why isnt it valid

Oh right yeah

if we really stay in 1962 we might as well just be sspx <:bruh:569616839340982272>

God I wish that were me

they're not in communion with Rome

Staying before the mid 60s

@Deleted User

might as well just become orthodox at that point

SSPX are funny and goofy and laughy

yeah

Im not in communion at all

Based

<:bruh:569616839340982272>

I havent been baptised or confirmed smh

what do u want from me

Oh, not based

I was wanting you to chime in on sspx

Me?

No

Obviously

sspx is good

I used to be SSPX but I recognized and resisted 😂 their errors

@Deleted User purgatory gang gang <:nazbol:589142322076319745>

They're not in communion with Rome, if you seek uber trad then might as well just be orthodox

Uhh

They are and they arent

It's a weird catholic legal limbo

it's a whole scandal

There’s a third Catholic position.

the lefebvrists

Literal third position

I gotta hear this

I go to an sspx parish and honestly, from my retard catechumen perspective, if its a solid service (which it is), Im gonna ignore the church politick autism that goes along with it

Something something SSPX is valid but illicit

It's like saying smoking weed is legal but owning it isnt

I enjoy going to church precisely because of the """trad""" nature of the sspx

would your faith be put in question if you were forced to attend NO?

Say sike right now @Deleted User