No

It's written the way it is because the person has seen the events unfold.

It's like when you tell someone what happened in your dream

The Message is prophetic, but the description is past tense basically.

Even if the dream is prophetic, it's still past tense to you

because John was not writing it when he was seeing at. Not that I am aware of anyway.

Correct

He saw the vision and then wrote it

So, past tense.

Revelation 6:8

**Revelation 6:8 - Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)**

```Dust


<8> And behold a pale horse, and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him. And power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with famine, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. ```

It reads like a dream

I know you're not the retard disagreeing with it, but I'm just demonstrating so that next time you can call a person on their bullshit

ok, but yeah I was laughing my ass off when he said there was no rider and what his justification for saying that was. It was the dumbest thing I have ever seen in my life, yet I fear someone is going to hard win that position.

yeah he's an absolute ignorant

TBH, the dumbest people are usually the Sola Scripture prots

he is convinced crusades were evil and unjustified

i know right

Imagine believing that

since he isn't convinced by the links i give him he deems it false immediately

I have been obsessed with the book of revelations recently, my favourite biblical book besides John.

doesn't even have de decency to glance over the references or links

book of revelations has some veryinteresting stuff yeah

Also who wrote the book of Revelations, I know it was a John but I heard there was like 3 different Figures who it could be.

I had some guy tell me that baptism is just a symbol because the term " born of water" meant a woman's water breaking lmao

i remember there being a series of books on the lies against the church, like the crusades and the "reformation" and the like

but then i'd have to get those books

can a charitable soul provide me with a link disproving the obvious lies and myths around the crusades?

all i find are old blogs and docs made by israel lovers

Lying against the Church is nothing new, ever since I read up on America's founding fathers, i actively starting disliking them. Thomas Paine, the faggot who wrote "Age of reason" actively made fun of Catholics being massacred by Robespierre saying how "they should perform their miracles now". The same asshole who talked about freedom, actively laughed at the freedom of the Clergy being taken away and them being exiled or killed. America as a country is Anti Catholic, America has never been supportive of Catholics, the one Catholic president we had got Shot, the people who founded it slandered the Church and now modern americans (and this is everywhere too, but it is caused by Americanism) are trying to subvert Church Dogma and morality.

yeah it ain't called the Great Satan for nothing

hmm, I never heard it being called "The Great satan", who invented that term

heard it being thrown around a lot

i think it fits

I agree

Sola Scripura Protestants aren't that dumb, the dumb ones are usually just followers of Sola Scriptora Protestants that half listen to the people they idolize and act like that's tantamount to actually opening up scripture. Not that Sola Scriptora Protestants always come to sound conclusions or anything, but Catholics don't tend to give Scripture enough credit. It is adequate for most things to the average person, authority mostly exists to make sure people who don't actually have reading comprehension skills aren't spreading half-read bullshit (outside a few key issues where there is genuine debate)

Sola Scriptura is dumb

Context IS important, and reading it without guidance can give way to any kind of erroneous interpretation or conclusion on it's teachings

Therefore, Sola Scriptura prots are dumb

sola scriptura more like dumbdumb scriptura