Not by itself, no

Also, infinity its impossible to know, because we could never know if something that appears infinite is actually infinite

But we know that numbers are infinite

Well, logic and maths in general are infinite, the abstract world is infinite, so we know that the infinite is logically provable, just as a god is logically provable

I wouldn't say it's all default knowledge. A child might understand 2+2 = 4 but pi is a complete mystery to them. The point being that they need to grow and expand their knowledge and understanding of mathematics.

yeah, but they could find pi with just rezoning

Right, but it isn't innate

empirical science comes from studying the world around us, formal science comes from pure reasoning

you don't born with the tools to know history or physics, but you born with the tools to know maths

let a human in a room isolated from the world and the only science he could develop to the maximum state are formal science

And metaphysics is a formal science like mathematics

Ah, le logical empiricism

May I ask what works of the Vienna circle have you read?

The question of the existence of God is a metaphysical one because there is not necessarily any empirical proof

but metaphysics, from what i know, are not axioms like maths and logic, there are different beliefs towards metaphysics, but not with maths and logic

works of the Vienna circle?

Logical empiricism is a collective definition set by the works of many authors who were memebers of a group called the Vienna circle

you are right, maybe there is no empirical way to prove it, but if you want to make it irrefutable, then it has to be proved in the abstract like maths

Still?

Maths don’t even support each other

Nothing has to be proved you entitled nit

Ever heard of Gödels incompleteness theorems?

some logical paradox?

Maths don’t add up as a language, they stop making sense when put together

i will google it

Ok

@Grengar yeah, insults are a good way to prove something

@Enryse may I suggest that reading the philosophers who actually make the claim may be more beneficial than asking internet strangers?

you could redirect me to some of them

please

Http://www.google.com

Lol

yeah that didnt helped the last time

i have invested a lot of time seeking a proof of god existence, of an after life, and other things, but i haven't found any that is irrefutable

because, believe or not, i want the after life to be true

Thomas Aquinas is one, Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange

That's pretty selfish bro

Yeah, Aquinas is for the niggas who always (allegedly) seek reason

I honestly have inclined more towards Palamite theology, but Aquinas is still an og big dog gangsta in this game

Yeah, I think I'm more inclined to Scotism myself

Also, MacIntyre is good too