only big brains here

so what's wrong with reading different doctrines

Nothing is

I'm not arguing against it

heck, Catholics are thomistic and I've read palamite theology

am I now a dumbass?

You're only allowed to read what the party allows you to read @MawLr

I'm just saying that fascism is not meant as a stepping stone to get to an absolute monarchy

because it's a successor

I said I discovered fascism though falangism and then I read mussolini

how does that correlate

That's exactly what happened in Rome tho
A militarist republic paved the way for a totally-not-dynastic despotic rulership

You're extrapolating incorrectly. Moreover, if you just looked and read the quote I provided, it would provide support to what I'm saying

"The Fascist negation of socialism, democracy, liberalism, should not, however, be interpreted as implying a desire to drive the world backwards to positions occupied prior to 1789, a year commonly referred to as that which opened the demo-liberal century. History does not travel backwards. The Fascist doctrine has not taken De Maistre as its prophet. Monarchical absolutism is of the past, and so is ecclesiolatry. Dead and done for are feudal privileges and the division of society into closed, uncommunicating castes."

This is also from the Doctrine of Fascism

either way, despite having read into fascism, monarchism seems more appealing as a Catholic

Can we at least agree that National Bolshevism is ridiculous?

fuck off Il Ras

your biggest minds also call the Catholics a religion of the past, yet we're still here

The Doctrine of Fascism states that Catholicism is the special religion of the Italian people

it's truly the primitive doctrine of attempting to exalt all men when by God all men have already been exalted

It also states that the fascist state makes no attempt to etch the love for God from the soul of man

Why only the italians though?

What about the 27 rites in the church?

he thinks he is italian

and what is he

I am, you spic @NokiaLord

american

Italian-American.

<:56:509492735237947422>

just another gringo <:yes:647929330017763337>

puñetero?

Dog biscuits, man

@MawLr he is a good man, he's just not italian

Lateran Treaty ftw @Sorel

Probably for that quote
"Monarchical absolutism is of the past and so is ecclesiolatry"
Is why it may not appeal as much to Catholics. Very Machiavellian of Mussolini to write this and then essentially take on the power of VEIII for himself, whilst declaring absolute monarchies redundant. For all the propagation of a new worldview and it's fully organic, the leadership model of the fascist republic is nothing more than a meritocratic (on the basis of party politics) monarchy. Even the transfer of power is then elective based on the previous wishes of the ruler, so it is dynastic in that way

Everything else regarding a corporative economy, militarism with total and inevitable warfare and what have you is practically just advanced Cameralism

You're all going to be made into dog biscuits when I'm done with you @NokiaLord @MawLr

Excuse me, I have to do something for a sec

is that some italian food

he's cooking with uncle Paulie

calm down zendir, you not being italian isnt a bad thing, could be worse, you could be *french* @Sorel

or even worse