Bunyip
Discord ID: 663182791835385867
521 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/6
| Next
Hello again poopies
I b workin
Lmao FAAAAG
Crikey jojo
Always knew you were a queer
@Deleted User account is dead and banned
I'm a mere simple Bunyip
Someone DM it to me
Strongly agree
W*myn
I b werkin
Probably cos I dyed my hair when I was 11 it brought the score down
๐
Fuck u eksdeeing I wanted to know what Nordic blonde Bunyip would look like
For those who are interested I can't remember
Dildo lol
Jew lover alert ๐ฌ
Mosaic law aint shit compared to Christ's law
Simple as
The question of the pope has been answered many times
In fact I think it's being asked so often it warrants an actual article or piece explaining the position and rebutting against nonsensical claims @Mozalbete โณฉ
Wynchwood is queer then
Organic integralist neo-Monarchist through transitional Fascistic republicanism
First mistake is thinking you know shit when u don't
๐
Fuck off cunt stop assassinating my character
Brvh
You're only allowed to read what the party allows you to read @MawLr
That's exactly what happened in Rome tho
A militarist republic paved the way for a totally-not-dynastic despotic rulership
Probably for that quote
"Monarchical absolutism is of the past and so is ecclesiolatry"
Is why it may not appeal as much to Catholics. Very Machiavellian of Mussolini to write this and then essentially take on the power of VEIII for himself, whilst declaring absolute monarchies redundant. For all the propagation of a new worldview and it's fully organic, the leadership model of the fascist republic is nothing more than a meritocratic (on the basis of party politics) monarchy. Even the transfer of power is then elective based on the previous wishes of the ruler, so it is dynastic in that way
Everything else regarding a corporative economy, militarism with total and inevitable warfare and what have you is practically just advanced Cameralism
Fucking Americans with the hot takes as usual
U just like bullying me don't ya nokia
Bro
Cringe
Yes
I'm just an angry nikka
I propagate siege (and it's novelisation in Turner Diaries) because it recognises that we won't be able to take power through electoral politics and every time there's a new party with an epic new ideological platform it doesn't fucking matter and might as well be relegated to the dustbin of the movement upon its very foundation
Such is why I say to the Mexicans to start Cathgang
@Sorel what organisation in Italy do you support
@Natio if that's the case then point me towards other stuff that says the same stuff as siege but less "cringe satanism lol"
@Sorel socialistic humanism
Fuck you mean
The capitalists are exploiting them in their home countries as well
Kinda redundant
>
@NokiaLord did u read what I sent U ages ago
Alright I'll send it to ya again
Maybe you'll think higher of me ๐
We're just gonna kill em
U.S/Australian policy to BLAX
Why not
Exterminationism and colonisation is epic and based
Something I wouldn't expect a stinky quadroon to understand nokia
How
Talmudic would be to say we ought to colonise and enslave them
8000 niggers for every whitey
How is my voice semitic
Rude dog
HOW
Smh I think I haven't joined capoid hours in too long
You must be misremembering
Not to save their souls?
I actually can think for myself so
๐
Fuck New South Wales
All my homies hate New South Wales
Possibly because your stance on imperialism is a little short sighted. The Leninist viewpoint is that states that can subjugate other states and turn them into tributaries or into colonies are in their final stage of capitalism, and thus can't function as a high society without the oppression and exploitation of the subjects of the Empire.
What the "trad" viewpoint is is that Empires form as a projection of state power, and the ability for one people to subjugate another is an expression of the former's inherent superiority in its ability of being able to form an Empire in the first place
Nokia's point is that they're not inherently savage @MawLr
A-rabs
Ethiopians aren't "black"
So to speak
Regardless they were clearly capable of self-governance
Aye, and as the imperialist worldview demands, they ought to be subjugated because they are inferior
In and of itself, it's pointless
Hitler waged his wars for a reason
Mussolini did it because his doctrine demanded war
Thanks I'm actually not as retarded as the spics make me out to be
Talk about China and the warlords
They never surrendered after 8 years of total war
They were in a civil conflict at the time so it's not like it's a question of loyalty
It's about the will to win and the conviction to achieve victory
It's not even an inherently fascist concept. Free french rejected the armistice
The Angloids never accepted any form of surrender agreement even after Hitler's closest comrade decided to become an envoy for peace
>Balkans
@Sorel increasing living standards is a very materialist and gay reason to wage wars of imperialism
You're both fairly gay
The recognition that wars are inevitable is an inherently fascist dogma
The materialism is not
Why wage wars of imperialism then
Ok so Mussolinis stated reason for waging that particular war was purely materialistic in motive
I'm just extrapolating based on what you're telling me
If it's "for resources" then it's material
What's the main motive then
๐ฌ
Gotta drive home now but I'll continue when I get there
U still around
What's the respect for
That's me every day though ๐ณ
.deepfry
.deepfry
.avatar
What
It's a deer skull buddy relax
What's wrong with my music
I like the way it sounds
521 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/6
| Next