because you need a broad spectrum

quite the jump, what state marginalizes the people?

ever read for the sake of it?

"Fascism desires the State to be strong and organic, based on broad foundations of popular support. The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporative, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organized in their res­pective associations, circulate within the State. A State based on millions of individuals who recognize its authority, feel its action, and are ready to serve its ends is not the tyrannical state of a mediaeval lordling. It has nothing in common with the despotic States existing prior to or subsequent to 1789."
- The Doctrine of Fascism

@MawLr Then it's just opportunism

Hardly the romantic idealism that true fascism demands

you're thick as bricks if you think one can't read into different doctrines to know them better

become fascist so you can get some very stylish boots and hats

I've quoted that book a couple of times here, I think everyone here should read it @Sorel

@Natio I can tell we'll be good pals

nice

welcome to the gang

As long as it's not Nazbol Gang.

based, you're one step from becoming a capoid

its CAPOID GANG

how do u speedrun dark magics irl, join moloch synagogue?

Capoidism

@Johnny Roleplay bruh dont shitpost in <#435520935647248414>

only big brains here

so what's wrong with reading different doctrines

Nothing is

I'm not arguing against it

heck, Catholics are thomistic and I've read palamite theology

am I now a dumbass?

You're only allowed to read what the party allows you to read @MawLr

I'm just saying that fascism is not meant as a stepping stone to get to an absolute monarchy

because it's a successor

I said I discovered fascism though falangism and then I read mussolini

how does that correlate

That's exactly what happened in Rome tho
A militarist republic paved the way for a totally-not-dynastic despotic rulership

You're extrapolating incorrectly. Moreover, if you just looked and read the quote I provided, it would provide support to what I'm saying

"The Fascist negation of socialism, democracy, liberalism, should not, however, be interpreted as implying a desire to drive the world backwards to positions occupied prior to 1789, a year commonly referred to as that which opened the demo-liberal century. History does not travel backwards. The Fascist doctrine has not taken De Maistre as its prophet. Monarchical absolutism is of the past, and so is ecclesiolatry. Dead and done for are feudal privileges and the division of society into closed, uncommunicating castes."

This is also from the Doctrine of Fascism

either way, despite having read into fascism, monarchism seems more appealing as a Catholic

Can we at least agree that National Bolshevism is ridiculous?

fuck off Il Ras

your biggest minds also call the Catholics a religion of the past, yet we're still here

The Doctrine of Fascism states that Catholicism is the special religion of the Italian people

it's truly the primitive doctrine of attempting to exalt all men when by God all men have already been exalted

It also states that the fascist state makes no attempt to etch the love for God from the soul of man

Why only the italians though?

What about the 27 rites in the church?