Message from @musty bussy
Discord ID: 617545728822214667
I actually agree
Shut up bot, not now
Sad how someone can’t have a new idea without everyone bringing drama and persisting it, then leaving due to it, I’ve wanted this to end since it started
My origins
water bottles are cute
Im sexually attracted to them
Woah, liquid-sexual
<:VoluntaryismEmoji:612152192836698112>
<:VolUnion:612152391772536843>
GG @JPineda777, you just advanced to level 2!
GUYSS!!!!
IT'S COMING!!!!!
?
THE VENGABUS!!!!
IT'S COMING!!!!
The Vengabus
It is coming
What is that nibba
Do you mean the boogaloo or sth else
it's here
Pneumaic ethics is basically the NAP change my mind
Can't deny this. Not to mention that it is laced with word-play and traps.
I can press X to doubt.
NAP is only a part of it, not the entirety.
REEEEEEEEEEEEE
What part isn't the NAP?#
1.) Non-contradiction Principle- Truth, must be non-contradictory.
2.) Consistency Principle- Truth must be applicable across all applications consistently.
3.) Ownership Principle- A rational actor owns, which their will extends over.
4.) Self-Ownership Principle- A rational actors will, is always extended of the self of the rational actor, therefore owns the self.
5.) Steading Principle- A rational actor can contain their will into a creation, by using their agency.
(Non-contradiction, Consistency principle) One in the same and is A priori from deriving the NAP
They can and do predate the NAP
Ownership principle - NAP => lockean ownership
bynecessity
The other half of the pneomaic ethics is the nap
4.) Self-Ownership Principle- A rational actors will, is always extended of the self of the rational actor, therefore owns the self.
this is the NAP as well it's how NAP is framed
the first half predates the other half which is technically the NAP by default