Message from @Jeebus

Discord ID: 632000135701725194


2019-10-10 23:37:42 UTC  

so in absence the state these very same things people would have shares in like a corporation of sorts and just like you have a vested interest in what you own so to would you in all liklyhood want to protect these things through voluntary means

2019-10-10 23:38:24 UTC  

essently the Hoppean would expect people to voluntarily fund private border securty

2019-10-10 23:38:44 UTC  

Cool. What if i own part of the border and decide to let those people in?

2019-10-10 23:38:55 UTC  

or are they assuming no such thing as a sale

2019-10-10 23:39:02 UTC  

or no such thing as self interest

2019-10-10 23:39:31 UTC  

plus most people come in through airplanes

2019-10-10 23:39:35 UTC  

not via walking

2019-10-10 23:40:40 UTC  

that's why it falls apart when you really pick at it

2019-10-10 23:40:41 UTC  

GG @Terry Arcona, you just advanced to level 6!

2019-10-10 23:41:06 UTC  

Contracts? What if i don't sign it?

2019-10-10 23:41:19 UTC  

or are they assuming that everyone who happens to own that land

2019-10-10 23:41:24 UTC  

will happen to sign that contract

2019-10-10 23:41:49 UTC  

Yeah, this whole ideas pretty lacking of being thought through completely

2019-10-10 23:41:54 UTC  

<:Bakard:612150766609629194>

2019-10-10 23:41:55 UTC  

and where is this border you speak of?

2019-10-10 23:42:01 UTC  

☝💯

2019-10-10 23:42:05 UTC  

very symmetrical

2019-10-10 23:42:18 UTC  

What the state said it was, that’s probably what they’d say

2019-10-10 23:42:21 UTC  

Who charts it?

2019-10-10 23:42:25 UTC  

<:577504126301241356:614732663122690059>

2019-10-10 23:42:54 UTC  

and why do i agree with your chart?

2019-10-10 23:43:00 UTC  

Let people own property, and don’t worry past that except allowing them to defend themselves, you know, not what we have now

2019-10-10 23:43:07 UTC  

What if i have a completely different idea of where it should be

2019-10-10 23:43:15 UTC  

💯

2019-10-10 23:44:02 UTC  

you either A. have to accept that all border land is some how privatly owned by these companies and not a single bit of it would go to indivdual property owners. B. assume that even if idivdual property owners owned parts of the land they all would act in the same way and some how uphold certain border norms regardless of self interest. or C. admit that Hoppeanism isn't actually libertarnism at all and there's a certain amount of central planning and authority involved with in it.

2019-10-10 23:44:20 UTC  

C

2019-10-10 23:44:22 UTC  

☝💯

2019-10-10 23:44:36 UTC  

A doesn't answer the question of sales

2019-10-10 23:44:48 UTC  

<:Fedora:612526847749652493>

2019-10-10 23:44:56 UTC  

B is i don't even know what to call it other than pipe dreaming

2019-10-10 23:45:14 UTC  

Delusion, hope, greater good, all of which aren’t good

2019-10-10 23:45:23 UTC  

It hinges on EVERYONE doing this.

2019-10-10 23:45:28 UTC  

Yep

2019-10-10 23:45:37 UTC  

<a:539480664316051457:614733786659422208> <:vol:612152059218755585> <a:539480664316051457:614733786659422208>

2019-10-10 23:45:38 UTC  

<:LCUEmoji:612151606552559617> <:lcupill:615072959786385448>

2019-10-10 23:45:44 UTC  

You could use "social pressure"

2019-10-10 23:45:46 UTC  

buut

2019-10-10 23:46:03 UTC  

If everyone was a hoppean it would work in which case unneeded

2019-10-10 23:46:10 UTC  

If not then it's pointless

2019-10-10 23:46:15 UTC  

<:LCUEmoji:612151606552559617>

2019-10-10 23:47:00 UTC  

Other argument is such that you need permission anyhow to go anywhere since all land is privately owned but such is an unprofitable logistics nightmare