But I was referring to 'that's an opinion'

I retract brainwashed for indoctrinated or 'misguided'

thinking that someone is misguided is subjective

therefore I relegate it to the realm of opinions

What is the oxford dictionary definition for misguided

`Having or showing faulty judgement or reasoning.`

Correct

Does the imply subjectivity?

judgement is subjective

What's the definition of judgement

An opinion or conclusion.

Is that the oxford dictionary conclusion?

'The ability to make considered decisions or come to sensible conclusions.'

for the count noun, yes

The mass noun would be correct for usage, the example provided showcases this: '‘an error of judgement’

which is subjective

either way lol

some judgements *can be* objective

Right

Regardless, my case works in the case of 'reasoning'

many people would come to the conclusion that not all religious people are brainwashed

therefore it is not objective

1 + 1 = 2 is subjective, opinion is not relevant

for example

Depends on what the terms can be extrapolated to mean

so, it is an opinion of individuals that religious people are brainwashed

not an objective fact

in order for that to be objective, you'd need to disprove the existence of a creator without a reasonable doubt

misguided is, in my opinion, a more appropriate word

Yes but to the extent towards the right facts are deployed it can be stated that those who are worshipping gods are making an error of judgement as they believe that there is fact showcasing the existence of god when there isn't fact to show that this fact is linked to the existence of god.

And no

That's not how the burden of proof works

neither side can prove or disprove

Which is why I never claim god doesn't exist

there really is no possibility of a burden of proof

you're entitled to your opinion 😉

Why so?

because neither side has the ability to prove their side or disprove the other side

Why do they lack this ability?

it's not a worthwhile argument to have

What makes it not worthwhile?