with respect, that's word salad lol

I assume you're familiar with the 'god can't create a rock that he can't move'

There’s no evidence either way, so the logical assumption is to assume the negative as the negative side is passive. The active side has the burden of proof.

Right

And the passive side is that we don't know and shouldn't take it as fact, so it isn't worthy of humouring

Otherwise we'd pray to every magical being ever, do every irrational thing ever.

in a traditional argument, absolutely

this is a discussion about the existence of a deity lol

So?

The main issue with the existence of god is that it’s a spiritualistic argument. So the most logical position is agnosticism

Should I disregard every 'traditional argument' because it regards X thing I believe to be greater than the rest of NOT X things?

Most atheists in practice are agnostics who assume the negative rather than default

that's what I was trying to get at, thank you @wiping account (DM for more info

it's a pointless discussion

Yes, I never claim to disprove god...

no offense Romerlin :P

Don't try to weasle out big boi

It’s only pointless when both already realize that god can’t be proven

I claim to argue that worshipping god is ubsurd

Because it can’t be proven right?

Yes, it can't be proven or empirically shown so why should it be humoured?

if something can be neither proven or disproven, it follows that any assessment should be treated as an opinion

until absolute evidence is found to back up either side

Then I suppose I'm of the opinion that all Christians are brainwashed and the tooth fairy is sucking my dick on Tuesday. Perhaps I can point towards the sins of christian society?

Every society has sins, that'd be a waste of typing

Then why do the same of any idea?

some worse than others, a few horrendously worse

Why do the same for state socialists or even statism?

May I direct your attention to my PFP

Okay..?

That doesn't answer my question

I reject the state

Why should you?

if you can't point towards what they've done wrong?

it's an inherently violent institution

and I am not a violent person :P

you can't do that, that'd be a waste of typing

'every society has sins'

yes, because they are made up of flawed individuals

Oh really? That's rich, but that's just your opinion right?

allowing a handful of the worst of those flawed individuals have authority over others is a travesty