Message from @Jeebus

Discord ID: 612680539908079625


2019-08-18 15:59:55 UTC  

Tag my with any other questions

2019-08-18 15:59:56 UTC  

You are?

2019-08-18 16:00:10 UTC  

A voluntarist

2019-08-18 16:00:39 UTC  

Not very helpful considering how many ideologies are considered voluntarist

2019-08-18 16:00:41 UTC  

But ok

2019-08-18 16:06:32 UTC  

@NO okay, I stand for ethical law, negative rights, subscriptive based ideas, privatization, etc.

2019-08-18 16:06:44 UTC  

Driving again, will respond when I’m stoped again

2019-08-18 16:07:01 UTC  

Talk when you're home

2019-08-18 16:07:08 UTC  

I don't want any accidents

2019-08-18 16:07:48 UTC  

Oh I mean like at McDonald’s, I stoped after driving my wife off at work, next I stop at McDonald’s to eat, then I’ll drive home, not texting and driving

2019-08-18 16:07:59 UTC  

Thanks for the concern in any case

2019-08-18 16:08:57 UTC  

Ayyyy get me 10 piece mcnuggets

2019-08-18 16:11:24 UTC  
2019-08-18 16:11:24 UTC  

GG @Jeebus, you just advanced to level 1!

2019-08-18 16:11:29 UTC  

What are your questions?

2019-08-18 16:11:31 UTC  

Where you at?

2019-08-18 16:11:58 UTC  

He’s asking what the lcu is, read above, I never explain it well to the varying voluntarist

2019-08-18 16:12:05 UTC  

😅

2019-08-18 16:12:07 UTC  

<a:pepedance:539480664316051457> <:vol:612152059218755585> <a:pepedance:539480664316051457>

2019-08-18 16:13:33 UTC  

The LCU is basically a form of governance based on an ethical position. That being pneumaic ethics.

2019-08-18 16:13:43 UTC  

It is a voluntary one.

2019-08-18 16:13:59 UTC  

What is pneumaic ethics

2019-08-18 16:14:04 UTC  

In short

2019-08-18 16:14:19 UTC  

Had we not been raided i would've just copy pasted it.

2019-08-18 16:14:24 UTC  

An ethical set that is a new angle on negative rights

2019-08-18 16:14:38 UTC  

Balancing the consequences and actions

2019-08-18 16:14:44 UTC  

Instead of one or the other

2019-08-18 16:14:52 UTC  

Structured in principles.

2019-08-18 16:15:02 UTC  

Starting with non contradiction and consistency

2019-08-18 16:15:13 UTC  

And true jeebus, ancoms and having to destroy stuff, guys can’t be like romerlin

2019-08-18 16:15:48 UTC  

heh, douchebags will be douchebags regardless of ideology

2019-08-18 16:16:17 UTC  

☝💯<:Fedora:612526847749652493>

2019-08-18 16:24:20 UTC  

Where’d he go?

2019-08-18 16:41:59 UTC  

Still good @Jeebus no changes

2019-08-18 16:42:05 UTC  

aight

2019-08-18 16:42:10 UTC  

removed it

2019-08-18 17:54:34 UTC  

Some guy asked if by both parties are the same I meant like coke and Pepsi...

2019-08-18 17:54:39 UTC  

My response was

2019-08-18 17:54:41 UTC  

More like how one tissue says it’s more durable and the other claims it’s softer.
People care more for titles than context, if you look at the context, there’s more that is the same than is different.
Like how durable does it need to be, and softness to a point matters, if it’s too soft, it’s not durable, if it’s too durable, it’s not soft, too much of either and you don’t have toilet paper, you have fragments and a mess or sand paper.

2019-08-18 17:56:23 UTC  

Not a bad analogy