"My freedom becomes complete only when it is my - might; but by this I cease to be a merely free man, and become an own man. Why is the freedom of the peoples a "hollow word"? Because the peoples have no might! With a breath of the living ego I blow peoples over, be it the breath of a Nero, a Chinese emperor, or a poor writer. Why is it that the G--- legislatures pine in vain for freedom, and are lectured for it by the cabinet ministers? Because they are not of the "mighty"! Might is a fine thing, and useful for many purposes; for "one goes further with a handful of might than with a bagful of right." You long for freedom? You fools! If you took might, freedom would come of itself. See, he who has might "stands above the law." How does this prospect taste to you, you "law-abiding" people? But you have no taste!"

GG @Lyndon B. Johnson, you just advanced to level 1!

My beliefs summarized

Rights do not exist in an objective sense

Our ideas of it only exists in our minds

We can not objectivly observe rights

I am free not because of rights its the use of my might that keeps me free

You should really look into stirner

GG @Larbi, you just advanced to level 2!

I regard rights as a spook

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IMUoVA5j1I&t=902s

I have a great idea, why don't we stop separating rights out into trans rights and gay rights and black rights, etc, etc and just call them human rights?

For the same reason we don't send the fire department to every house.

Linear time is a thing.

Different groups have faced different persecutions for different amounts of time and require different -unique- solutions.

Why do you think scientific studies take different populations into account?

There are also the chuds who say that doing things that demonstrably harm trans people aren't violating their humanity, just "not acknowledging their delusions"

I understand that, however, a right is something that you are ought to have. If it is ought that one group not be discriminated against for instance, then why not for another group?

What makes it okay for one demographic to have a right to x and not another?

Name one right gay or trans people get over anyone esle.

GG @JanglesSciencelad, you just advanced to level 1!

Well, I am just saying that nobody should have more rights than other people and labelling rights as "demographic 1" rights and "demographic 2" rights, so on and so forth insinuates that someone has more or less or different rights than someone else

I want to get rid of that

I think it would make the equal rights argument stronger

Negative rights are supposed to be applied uniformly across anyone of any identity

And they are not to be infringed on

I am just speaking in the abstract right now

But yes wes

Continue your points Techno

if you'd please

get in here boi

Basically, if you are after equal rights for all these sub-demographics, why not just say that you want all humans to have human rights as the alphabet soup of sexualities is a subset of all humans

get in here.

talking circle.

https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/

https://attackthesystem.com/gay-victimology-and-the-liberal-kulturkampf/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LIyVsFF458&t=3371s

https://about.riot.im/

https://twitter.com/Karmalyse