Hence why he and Romerlin use them .

I'm just not willing to use manipulation to achieve my goals

What?

again, as long as it's all voluntary I'm fine with it

What terms do I use?

Whether it's bad or not is not up for question. We're concerning wherever it is coherent to a non-aggressive norm

GG @Larbi, you just advanced to level 6!

And that's fine

I use direct methods exclusively

Carrot-and-Stick is not my style, but it can be very effective

And I agree with you on this.

You lose when they support aggression

Even 'positive human interaction' is undefined and is a lure

if you can't reason someone away from thinking aggression is necessary, they're a lost cause

Wrong and 'let's throw punches' are different cases

Its more, my religion says so

So I do it

And, freedom is cucked

are you an islamist?

No

uhh Scientology? lol

I am describing the people I debate

Freedom is cucked?

I am a militant athiest

ahh, also known as "*everything wrong with the world today*"

militant athiests and militant theists

are a cancer on this world

Ideology is a cancer

It's disgusting

Not if it's voluntary

I believe your moral compass is expanded beyond 'freedom from coercion'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x7AHyCoCDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCcezGuEzvA

GG @Phobia, you just advanced to level 6!

Jesus seemed to be very egalitarian as well

Was he a socialist too?

Kek

This is an appeal to ends

people can have attributes from all political spectrums

Something I've made up on the spot and shall continue to use.

that doesn't mean you should be labeled into those spectrums

Fair