You lose when they support aggression

Even 'positive human interaction' is undefined and is a lure

if you can't reason someone away from thinking aggression is necessary, they're a lost cause

Wrong and 'let's throw punches' are different cases

Its more, my religion says so

So I do it

And, freedom is cucked

are you an islamist?

No

uhh Scientology? lol

I am describing the people I debate

Freedom is cucked?

I am a militant athiest

ahh, also known as "*everything wrong with the world today*"

militant athiests and militant theists

are a cancer on this world

Ideology is a cancer

It's disgusting

Not if it's voluntary

I believe your moral compass is expanded beyond 'freedom from coercion'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x7AHyCoCDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCcezGuEzvA

GG @Phobia, you just advanced to level 6!

Jesus seemed to be very egalitarian as well

Was he a socialist too?

Kek

This is an appeal to ends

people can have attributes from all political spectrums

Something I've made up on the spot and shall continue to use.

that doesn't mean you should be labeled into those spectrums

Fair

I watched the 2nd video with great skepticism

as a devout Christian, even

I ended up agreeing with most of what he implies

Alan Watts and Mark Passio.... I mean, c'mon lol

Thank you Phobia, you are so lit m8

statists have made great efforts to demonize everything that doesn't align with their goals

True

chief among those things is religion detached from politics

Don't tell Theocrats this REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Islam and Judaism are incredibly nationalistic, but Christianity is not

Press X to doubt