could very well be

probably a constitutional panarchist, which is pretty based out of the ninimal gov positions

much more than anything else

i'd be down for such a thing. But don't forget the following. If A does something to B, say steals his chest of moneyz. Even if B does not have any subscription or whatever because he can't afford it or straight up doesn't want it. B can still contact a firm to collect and then the firm gets paid out of extracting the cost out of the perpetrator

^^^^ ayy lmao, keep this on you

record it into a text

kinda crucial

Also, If you want a text file that links to lectures, books, and files let me know ayy lmao, I can DM you some stuff

Of course i'd still support your idea on principle to make things easier, Plus insurance companies would like this to make their job easier

yeah that is a very good point @Jeebus I'm just thinking (I know I'm going hella crazy rn) but let's say some ten thousand people decide to build a fascist ethno state or whatever and start forcing people into it

I don't think the market would really deal with that for monetary gain

And replacing the corporation with liability levying via contractual law on a business would be also vitally important

too prevent statism from returning

Criminals don't like operating under a law which makes their crimes legal

unless they convince everyone they are

GG @Jeebus, you just advanced to level 7!

Now some might say, what about the poor people who can't afford this? There are free or low-cost ways people can arbitrate/secure themselves as well. Perhaps could also form contracts with their neighbors for protection, protect themselves with their own firearms, already have security as part of the HOA they're already paying for in a community, or join a mutual aid society that provides an arbitration service. The possibilities are endless here.

but that's another story

@Wes The Savage I'm always up for recommendations, I'm still very new to the whole scene

GG @ayy lmao, you just advanced to level 3!

as you can probably tell lol

@ayy lmao Imagine for a second, that 1000 criminals banded together under murdercorp

I could've SWARN I met you somewhere

Murder is now legal as far as they are concerned

I know the name

The problem is, evidently, living under such a system would be too much of a hassle.

Can't trust anyone

Plus nobody else would agree to it

But even if they make murder illegal, they won't find a mutual arbitrator/judge who will agree to their "law" when a conflict occurs

You'd have a target on your head

and no one would pay for such a thing

essentially, you'd be paying to have your rights violated

@The_NothingForEverything They themselves wouldn't even want this because living in perpetual fear isn't fun

^

well I guess I got a new nice sticker I can flex when talking trash in online politics discussions boys, I can now lable myself panarchist I guess

but yeah I don't care much about lables, it's been great having some reasonable disscussion in here

and everyone piling on the argument just shows me people enjoy talking about it :)

I'll have to go to sleep now, I'll be back posting more uneducated assumptions to correct soon 😂

Isn't panarchism contained within anarchism?

I just thought of something

GG @Selganor, you just advanced to level 8!