Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 501256286692704266
i have nothing
the bible is backed up by Tradition. not the other way around
Monkish
Yes, the orthodox gets its teachings from the bible and Apostlic succession
the orthodox, catholics, and anglicans all recognize this
Also dim account, what was the third temptation of Christ
same as the catholics
i dunno man. what?
Ave Maria
Ave Maria
Ave Maria
It was to worship satan in exchange for ruling the world
yea i came from a prot family so really all i know is "was this in the Bible or not"
After his 40 days in the wilderness
So the question then is
yea prots have it completely reversed
i've yet to actually be confirmed anywhere so i'm trying to find the denomination closest to the truth
Why would the church form a political body to impose its will and therefore rule the world under an earthly body if it was a temptation that Christ rejected
yeah I'm in a similar boat
>Why would the church form a political body to impose its will and therefore rule the world under an earthly body if it was a temptation that Christ rejected
that's a lot of implying there homie
I do not like the way protestantism as a whole is headed though
Are they not a political body?
The vatican is
Right
here it is the best pic of the newspaper shooting
And by doctrine they are the Church
It being literal palace is sus
the state of vatican city =/= the church
🤔
this isn't even a disagreement the orthodox and catholics have
im autistically researching shit trying to decide between catholic and orthodox
its rly hard borthers...
^^^^
No, it was just part of the initial reasoning
I asked if criticism was part of the argument
Goon said "ayyyyyy go ahead"
i thought i would just buy the best bible translation i could find and judge after that but idk which translation to buy
Ive been shitting for like 40 minutes so ill be here for a while
Not NIV