Message from @hiblast
Discord ID: 512310614148775938
@Shadows yes, that's why voting for women because their women is a problem. Additionally, why quota laws for women are bad.
That's such a garbage trailer, to conflate people who faced actual oppression with the basketball players now who are more privileged than the most white people but pretending they are facing the same things.
That letter got to be fake.
Do you think he read i any way because it made a good launching point for his bit.
I don't know, I'm sure they get plenty of similar but less crazy letters that could be used to make similar points.
Is that how they manage to admit that she belongs in prison? By calling her a republican?
Cognitive Thought is going LIVE @ 5! On today's show he will discuss the reaction to some veteran stream.me content creators' reaction to unwelcome "nazis" encroaching upon their territory and prize money. Come join, chat and laugh. https://www.stream.me/TheCognificent or https://youtu.be/Ylu7VRr0buE
LIVE with Zack & Esau watching Jet Packs & Hover Bikes - #CogLive
Come and join the chat! (:
https://www.stream.me/TheCognificent
I think that hot Russian chick (but I repeat myself) was one of the best conversations he's ever had in that format.
Ryan Reynolds voicing Pikachu..... not what I imagined the first live action movie to be like, but OK
Ya someone already posted it :)
Wow, that's weird. I wasn't expecting them to go that direction with it
I'm kinda interested now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=it1xTbblhvw
Styx making me take my user name a bit more serious...
Will european's fight for their land and rights when the time comes?
Eventually, but most likely under rising authoritarian nationalistic regimes. (Likely ethno-national)
At 3:20 Jim starts talking about the tweets if you don't want to watch the whole video.
Where the tweets at
It's just people talking shit
How many hours of Ethan Ralph's shitty voice and Jim's lowest quality content do I have to listen to before someone links actual evidence and doesn't just allude to it?
It was a retweet
>he tweeted WSJ
>it was a retweet
Pick one
I don't document this stuff
Sargon also retweeted Tariq Nasheed lol
K?
"Sargon had tweets towards the WSJ talking about warski."
This didn't happen, is my point. He retweeted another account that was going on about the stream, WSJ jumped on it. I consider Sargon's 100 follower shitposting account retweet no more responsible for that than it is for Tariq Nasheed's output.
No more responsible than Jim is for Ralph's dumb bullshit, which is to say, not at all given current "evidence"
?
I was just trying to say not all the jokes towards Sargon&Friends were unwarranted by pointing out this incident. I wasn't trying to go deeper into it.
@hiblast you haven't written a peer reviewed article about it???
Lol
You made a claim that has no evidence and then walked it back to something entirely different, and your "proof" was just a waste of time
Tweet/retweet isn't that huge of a different, the intent/"joke" still stands, and again, I just merely mentioned it.
And it wasn't meant to be proof, more so his reasoning for retweeting it.
@Deleted User any proper tweet, logs, etc would work. It shouldn't be hard. Jim, Ralph et al procure those all the time. If you're going to make a claim and not back it up, you're just doing dumb ops shit
>the intent/"joke" still stands
This is sjw reasoning
>I know your intent. You weren't *really* joking