I just googled it and found this article https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/gun-ownership-rates-by-state/

Well, I'm good with that one, because it lists Texas as 18 instead of 30

It looks like the CBS stat was based on Injury Prevention’s “Gun ownership and social gun culture”survey, whereas your source is based on General Social Survey’s “Trends in Gun Ownership in the United States”. It’s interesting that both are surveys and both show fairly different numbers for a lot of states.

🆙 | **Psychlops924 leveled up!**

I also got the Switzerland number from Wikipedia

@Agent Smith that map is the background on my work computer

The wide variance makes me glad, actually. I don't really want there to be a terribly accurate count of how many guns there are out there.

@Psychlops924 oh, I know. I lived in Utah for four years while I went to BYU

@Agent Smith I don't get it

the only difference between the faces of Clark Kent and Superman is the glasses and Lois Lane gets to see both up close but she still doesn't recognize him

@Deleted User ^^

Oooh

I'm slow

@Deleted User won't happen.

By 2020 a new game will take over.

https://scontent.ftpa1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/44658252_2249442508606985_6332128812012142592_n.png?_nc_cat=1&_nc_ht=scontent.ftpa1-2.fna&oh=30ced1becaf659bcd163283b7dcf1e5e&oe=5C49D321

Apparently that's the bomb received by CNN

In comparison to the ISIS flag

Its definitely a false flag. Why would any of them idiots be worth killing?

The right doesn't benefit by making martyrs of leftists, but we actually have a lot to lose.

That's if you're looking at the right as a monolith of principle. If you're looking at it as a fed-up right winger who is tired of being ostracized and belittled by the Left, then it makes more sense.

I don't expect even *most* people in general to be strictly principled. But to intend to kill others takes things beyond just a mere emotional response

There's something else going on here.

Other than Aunty Maxine, nobody on the list has any direct connection to policy. In short, killing any of them is only fodder for a voter outrage, and most people on the right are aware of that.

Well, it all depends on how the media frames it now.

Exactly

If it had been Pelosi, Schumer, feinstein, Warren, Bernie, and Harris, I'd be saying something completely different

The Obamas are social figures at this point

once again, that would just be fodder to pander to the democrat base

Most of them are social figures at this point but the point is that if it was a right-winger, they are attempting to destroy "idols" or symbols of the Democrats.

@J Edgar that wasn't a rebuttal, I am agreeing

🆙 | **Token Faggot leveled up!**

Taking down idols of thought is left wing ideology, that's why I'm concerned

'Idols' is a more than fair assessment, unfortunately. That's all they are when you get past all the bs

exactly. a serious threat would have gone to people who could actually enact policy

The funny thing about it was that it was mostly sent to the people who are big players in the "Don't be civil to the Right" crowd.