Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 543574693018337291


2019-02-08 22:16:37 UTC  

I hate to put it this way, but I think that John McCain's death was the best thing to ever happen to Lindsey Graham.

2019-02-08 22:27:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/266396659062145025/543558607069904897/Screenshot_20190208-172555__01__01.jpg

2019-02-08 22:28:02 UTC  

In a group text....

2019-02-08 22:29:00 UTC  

It's actually texts like these that turn me off from the Climate Change discussion. Feels very.... Armageddon-y.

2019-02-08 22:29:15 UTC  

That’s insane.

2019-02-08 23:19:10 UTC  

I mean it’s very obvious we’re all about to die because of climate change so let’s just kill ourselves now. Lefties first

2019-02-08 23:29:27 UTC  

How ling have people been saying “in X years city Y will be underwater”

2019-02-08 23:29:54 UTC  

Since about 2000?

2019-02-08 23:30:03 UTC  

Before then they were saying we’d be under ice

2019-02-08 23:30:05 UTC  

I was gonna say about 20.

2019-02-08 23:30:09 UTC  

...so technically under water

2019-02-08 23:30:21 UTC  

If you include that about ... close to 60 years now

2019-02-08 23:30:24 UTC  

The people who I’m most interested in getting a pro opinion -

2019-02-08 23:30:29 UTC  

property insurers

2019-02-08 23:30:35 UTC  

Yep

2019-02-08 23:30:56 UTC  

But @Abstract Cossack keep in mind, government ruins the metrics a bit

2019-02-08 23:30:58 UTC  

U think anyone else im the world has a more compelling interest foe an accueate forcast?

2019-02-08 23:31:16 UTC  

Oh don get me started on govt numbers

2019-02-08 23:31:31 UTC  

You’d think tho -

2019-02-08 23:31:32 UTC  

Because of the “aid” programs they keep pumping out, it basically makes people unaware of the exact risk to life and property

2019-02-08 23:31:45 UTC  

Nah not in the way you’re thinking I reckon

2019-02-08 23:31:47 UTC  

private insurers should have independent metrics rigt?

2019-02-08 23:32:03 UTC  

The issue I’m seeing is that government “aid” after a disaster fucks the cost numbers up

2019-02-08 23:32:15 UTC  

mmm interesting

2019-02-08 23:32:30 UTC  

i didn’t consider that angle b4

2019-02-08 23:32:48 UTC  

Because if the insurer doesn’t have to pay out anywhere near enough to cover the cost of a natural disaster in, say, the Louisiana region because of government “aid”

2019-02-08 23:33:09 UTC  

Can you imagine the difference in premiums?

2019-02-08 23:33:20 UTC  

Or on the effect of people choosing to live in those localities?

2019-02-08 23:33:23 UTC  

AAAAAHHHH!

2019-02-08 23:33:26 UTC  

1!!11!1

2019-02-08 23:33:34 UTC  

yes

2019-02-08 23:33:36 UTC  

Right?

2019-02-08 23:33:39 UTC  

yup

2019-02-08 23:34:09 UTC  

I agree completely that government fucks up the metrics to make it seem more like a crisis

2019-02-08 23:34:32 UTC  

But on the other hand, they’re also screwing it up by covering at least part of the cost of natural disasters

2019-02-08 23:34:51 UTC  

i am always under the assumption

2019-02-08 23:35:01 UTC  

if there’s a way to screw it up

2019-02-08 23:35:04 UTC  

govt will find it

2019-02-08 23:35:11 UTC  

It’s like Murphy’s law but for government

2019-02-08 23:35:12 UTC  

makes more jobs for them

2019-02-08 23:35:17 UTC  

We should dub it Marx’s law