Message from @C1PHER
Discord ID: 559514379679432714
yeah, I hate how pols try to claim that a "mandatory buyback" isn't confiscation
exactly
confiscation with the required compensation.
this was why we compensated the slave owners
their property was taken
or "freed"
and why freeing slaves was such a thorny issue. they were property
Since it isn't a voluntary transaction it can't really be called compensation since the money given does not surpass the value of the weapon to you (probably)
its still compensation
idk about new zealands laws, but here in the us. you must be compensated for property taken by the government. imminent domain is an example
this is also why they dont ban things retroactively, because they would have to compensate owners
from what I hear, these buybacks usually give you something like $100 for your gun. I'd still be pretty pissed about having to turn in my guns for something like 10% of their worth being called "just compensation"
from what ive seen, the $100 figure comes from the voluntary buy backs that get done occasionally.
the gov is required to give fair market value.
anything voluntary would not fall under the just compensation clause
hence the lower price at a voluntary buyback
Except for bump stocks apparently
and thats why its being challenged
thankfully
true. I love seeing the gun dealers hang around those buybacks and offer people more money for their guns
lol or the dudes making guns and then going to the buybacks
that entire bump stock situation is BS, even besides just compensation
like zip guns etc
oh totally, theyre making a stronger argument than just "just compensation"
LOL
oof that hillary clinton one
imagine thinking that is actually possible
lol
Dude, those where Hillarious 😂
It's not like other situations clearly demonstrate what would happen *cough* Nixon
^
Perusing news sites to see how the MSM is reacting to the Mueller report news. This one is my favorite so far.
Ya, that's not going to stop.
The real "cops" are too busy scanning Facebook for mean words...