what happened did the democrats abort that child?

I didn't say I was a nice guy.

I don't even need to say.

Happy pride month everyone

¿Is it real?

The womens football team won 13-0 against other women. How has that anything to do with how much women should be payed compared to men?

If that was the score against a team of men, I would absolutely agree.

I still wouldn't agree that they should be payed more just for winning. The only money they should get from a win is if there was price-money to be won by winning the game.
Wages would automatically be going up by market forces if indeed a womens team would make themselves more interesting to watch.

depends on the compensation model, many sports use a % of revenue model, which is garbage

since the expense ratios can be higher in lower revenue sports

so for example in the wnba the complaint is women make less as a % of revenue, however operating expenses also make up a much larger % of revenue as well because revenue as a whole is much smaller. At the same time they are arguing for more money to be spent on advertising and market development which of course would eat into the revenue pie

now if they did % of profit, they would share in the benefit of expense reductions

Operating expenses are often curbed by using facilities that have been build, and been payed, for men's sports.

But I think that is what you were saying anyways.

You don't really need to keep reposting the same things...

When Sacramento Monarchs can even half fill the stadium, then we can talk about raisin pay levels.

who?

Exactly.

http://stonetoss.com/comic/united-kangdom/

Lolwut

Wew

You're typically allowed to profit off of open source work so long as what you produce is also open source

If you're following the rules it's 100% above board

The point of FOSS is open, shared functionality

Iirc, I could, under Xonotic's license, go and print a bunch of physical copies and sell them, in theory

There would be no legal action taken against me, because the ability to obtain the game freely has not been infringed

The flip side is that you have something like RHEL, wherein everything outside of their officially supported version (IE the one with their branding and tech support) is up for grabs, which has led to offshoots like CentOS. Conversely, Red Hat pulls from Fedora, which is more community driven (and free)

Is it unethical to use code in a way permitted by the contributor?

Like if Gab is breaking rules re: licensing, they should be dinged. Otherwise I don't see an ethical issue here. If you contribute code under a license, you are consenting to the use of your code under the parameters of that license. This is voluntarily contributed code

@Legalize
There's nothing unethical about it.
If it we're, fodev.com, fonline-reloaded.net, and fonline2.com would all be guilty. (I mean, they are for pissing on the Fallout name, but not for profiting off same.)
For that matter, so would most bands... .mp3

@Legalize its not unethical or scummy. open source code is MEANT to be used freely by all. In commercial products you have to follow whichever open source license the code uses if you include it. This is standard practice in SWE.

you know my background, and therefore i can speak with authority on this

🆙 | **Bigfoot leveled up!**

hmm lol

So no sex change surgeries for wolverine either?

Of course what woulf a trans wolverine be without the ability to commit suicide