Message from @Abstract Cossack
Discord ID: 592385835844763649
Saying "women should" is not a direct instruction to individuals.
@Mandatory Carry nothing against your friends, but that sounds like the height of degeneracy! BTW what exactly are they repopulating?
How general do you want it to be? 90% 80-20 50/50? At which point are you talking about what women should do, or what some women should do.
You can spin yourself up as much as you want on that question, it doesn't impact what I said at all.
You said what women should do... I'm asking how many.
And I'm under no obligation to de-generalize my statement.
Neat, so i guess we aren't talking about any people at all then.
Yes, philosophical discussions of how people in general might best live their life are impossible unless you specify an individual.
funny
Its a terrible standard for a philosophy then, as most people won't follow it.
Well, maybe not terrible, but not ideal.
@scaevola honestly, if they are consistent and don't sleep around with others outside of that relationship. I don't see it as all that degenerate.
Though right now we're not in a cultural situation where polygamy enmass is justified, and will result in more incels.
Anyone who follows a philosophy doesn't understand the purpose of philosophy
*"Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself; And by the measure ye judge, so shalt ye **BE***" ¿or is it **be**? *"judged."*
I know more about the history here that *isn't mine to tell,* but the short-short version is, I choose to encourage them to be them.
And a great irony, ¿are you sitting down?, is that he is the least conservative of the bunch... Very right-center, v. hard right/harder right. (The not-so-lesbian is one of those "scary right" types other than neo-nazi.)
@scaevola
That makes sense of why they are into a polygamous relationship then.
I agree with DJ that polygamy is an adaptive response to certain environmental factors. Often I think a response to a high violence rate with the women rapidly repopulating with the stock of 'survivor' men.
@Mandatory Carry I dont think this is the right place to argue theology so if you want we can talk in private messages about it, but that must be the most misused bible quote ever. It doesnt mean that you shouldn't challenge sinful behavior. And good for them on being right wing, I still believe the children would benefit more in a traditional two parent household. Maybe they are doing a good job at parenting, but just because something is good doesnt mean it cant be improved.
those chineses are pretty smart maybe they are on to something
I don't think generally polygamy is a good thing. But i'm also building up a big waifu harem.....
@Shadows how Genghis of you.
"have become more visible"
only because people looked lol
there's been genuine racial tension along certain lines here for a while, and the area with the highest Asian-Canadian population in BC is the most conservative
I dont think theyre white supremacist though, I think that's vice just being retarded
But typical Western conservatism = white supremacy, remember?
Canadian conservatism is basically quasi-religious centrism, which is double nazi territory of course :^)
Or maybe Asians-Canadians are working on a long goal of self extermination.
Criss de calice de tabarnak!!!
then they should start by putting their street signs in fucking English, as the law dictates
You sometimes get lazy when joining the white devil....
😈 my devil is purple
white supremacist china people
@DJ_Anuz I disagree on principle alone; not repopulation.
Polygamy whether consented upon, or not is the degeneracy of two-way relationships. Just as you cannot reasonably care for [X] number of children physically, mentally, emotionally, financially, and so on the same can be said with partners. You are openly partaking in said act that intrinsically describes your lack of faith, and commitment. In addition, there is a potential increased risk of STD's, and by proxy partners who are in said open relationship are more likely to sleep around with those outside that circle because that mentality is what plagues every single individual within.
Also, could you explain blondes disease in this context? I don't think I've actually heard of it before.
Polygamy is not the same thing as an open relationship. It is multiple marriage and in the traditional context there would be the same amount of sexual fidelity as in monogamous marriage, just between a man and multiple women.
Regardless of the delineation it's degeneracy.
Blonde's Disease is a term made up by Blonde for women that don't have any kids nor get married and then just go crazy when they're past the age where they could reasonably do those things.





