Message from @TheCompanyMan
Discord ID: 592404715594317834
then they should start by putting their street signs in fucking English, as the law dictates
You sometimes get lazy when joining the white devil....
π my devil is purple
white supremacist china people
@DJ_Anuz I disagree on principle alone; not repopulation.
Polygamy whether consented upon, or not is the degeneracy of two-way relationships. Just as you cannot reasonably care for [X] number of children physically, mentally, emotionally, financially, and so on the same can be said with partners. You are openly partaking in said act that intrinsically describes your lack of faith, and commitment. In addition, there is a potential increased risk of STD's, and by proxy partners who are in said open relationship are more likely to sleep around with those outside that circle because that mentality is what plagues every single individual within.
Also, could you explain blondes disease in this context? I don't think I've actually heard of it before.
Polygamy is not the same thing as an open relationship. It is multiple marriage and in the traditional context there would be the same amount of sexual fidelity as in monogamous marriage, just between a man and multiple women.
Regardless of the delineation it's degeneracy.
Blonde's Disease is a term made up by Blonde for women that don't have any kids nor get married and then just go crazy when they're past the age where they could reasonably do those things.
Ah, I see.
Then tough shit.
Also sounds like you guys are arguing over the differences between polygamy and polyamory
@C1PHERyup
Yes.
I wasn't.
@[DGI]tech polygamy doesn't increase the odds of STD's so long as there is fidelity in the marriages.
So long as 5 clean women are sleeping with only one man the chance of an STD spreading is the same as one clean woman sleeping with one man.
I would say for society it would be better for 10 children to have the presence of a father split between them, than it would be for 3 children to have the presence of a father all the time, and 7 that have no presence.
Your argument could be against having multiple children as well.
Just because you have multiple children or wives doesn't mean that you can't properly care for all of them, assuming you have the resources.
PICTURES
π
β₯οΈ
π me... waiting on mandatori
lol
and the past conversation is about degenracy. Polygamy and Polyamory are both morally wrong.
@Salacious Swanky Cat well, the thing is
No
Wrong
XD
βοΈ
@scaevola
Just because a quote come from a religious source doesn't mean it's not a true statement in society;
Example; The Jews have a strict rule against pork products; Without microscopes, they could never have known about tricanosis (spelling), yet they knew not to eat pork.
I *ALWAYS* (and obnoxiously) include the second half of the quote, *"by the measure,"* to address your ***LEGITIMATE*** objection; It ***IS*** right and proper (and God damn it, ***FAIR***) to call out improper behavior (ranging from *'you're not very chartiable'* to ***"Β‘YOU MURDEROUS FUCKER!"***), but bearing in mind that the same measure you use will be used against you... *hint hint*
That was WAY too long for that.
π
You're welcome. π
π
@TheCompanyMan βThere is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens. A time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot, a time to kill and a time to healβ





