They're trying to mock the person they replied to, in not a very smart way

It falls flat because their world view is that police systematically discriminate against women as agents of the patriarchy when in reality all of society is heavily biased towards upholding the safety and well being of women

For good reason by the way. Women are far more valuable in terms of reproduction which is one of the largest influencers of our evolution

https://twitter.com/RussiaInsider/status/1143520244356399104?s=19

Oh boi. The mood of our country is now determined by the subhumans in internet comment sections according to literally who even

*DESTROYED*

*BRUTALIZED*

*WRECKED*

SHAPIROD

Does the 2nd amendment cover this?

Possibly, but if you used the nuke outside of self defense... I would fire my nuke at you.

next target

Too late

Matt describes why nukes aren’t covered by the second amendment pretty well in one of his videos. Basically the second amendment protects the individual’s right to keep and bear arms including all weapons that could reasonably be deployed in defense of one’s self, family, or property without necessarily harming non-attackers. So this includes all guns including automatics but doesn’t include things like hand grenades and rocket launchers for example since the potential for collateral damage is inherent

They’ve already quarantined The_Donald <@342475271473070080>. I linked a reddit post about it

I bought a mug from that guy

Carlos Maza is a terrorist. He want people to feel threatened by physical violence so he can get his political outcome

that subname has to be ironic they are rabid in there

"Let us know when the right stops calling Democrats communists. The Democrats aren't even left wing."

and retarded it seems

https://summit.news/2019/06/26/election-meddling-reddit-quarantines-the-donald-forum-on-first-night-of-presidential-debates/

“The Democrats aren’t even left wing”
If you believe this then there can be no productive conversation. We live in two different worlds and disagree on reality

Such is the case with a lot of political debates, it seems

it gets interesting trying to square that circle, does he mean they are right wing?
I wonder what kind of definition of left and right he's even using
is it just the old thing of all bad things are right wing

I'd ask him but being such a moderate policitcal discussion subreddit, they've blocked further comments...

@amlam do you know which of Matt's videos that is? I've been trying to solidify my thought process on where the line is on the 2nd amendment. I knew it would be somewhere south of nukes but was trying to figure out how far

@Draco552big tanks and icbms Watching over my house 😎😎

Unfortunately no I don’t remember which one it is. But this is an idea that has been thought of before by philosophers so I’m sure there’s stuff out there

Stick a nuclear submarine in my pond. Hope no one tries sneaking up on my house

you sir have insulted my honour I challenge you to nukes at 10 paces

I'll take a dive through Matt's older videos someday soon and see if I can't find it

I don't understand how collateral would be a principled line. Is the thought process that no home defense could happen in a scenario other than both parties being in the home? Or that defense of the nation isn't an inherent aspect of 2A?

If you can’t deploy your means of self-defense without necessarily endangering the lives of innocents then it can’t be considered self defense

Necessary endangerment is contextual

You have to judge a means abstractly though rather than some specific case

There’s no way in which to detonate a nuclear device and only endanger the person who is attacking you