Message from @uncephalized

Discord ID: 599121660293021706


2019-07-12 06:08:20 UTC  

Populate lots of places, yes.

2019-07-12 06:08:59 UTC  

Planets are actually the worst places to start @Clive if we want to expand into space. I'm all about O'Neill cylinders.

2019-07-12 06:09:40 UTC  

Just fill up the solar system with trillions of people living in giant tubes. Much easier than terraforming.

2019-07-12 06:09:49 UTC  

Every region of the world will inevitably be unique. In Europe, a European is a fair-skinned Indo-European-speaking Christian, with limited though clearly delineated exeptions.

2019-07-12 06:09:52 UTC  

Is that like a Dyson sphere?

2019-07-12 06:10:21 UTC  

No. It's a cylindrical habitat miles across that rotates to provide artificial gravity.

2019-07-12 06:10:33 UTC  

"Fair-skinned" by global standards. I'm no anti-Med

2019-07-12 06:10:34 UTC  

So like a Dyson sphere

2019-07-12 06:10:44 UTC  

Although enough of them around the Sun would make a Dyson swarm

2019-07-12 06:11:00 UTC  

Oooo are we talkiing about superstructures now?

2019-07-12 06:11:02 UTC  

No, a Dyson sphere encapsulates a whole star.

2019-07-12 06:11:10 UTC  

thats fairly broad if we're trying to preserve heritage, no?

2019-07-12 06:11:16 UTC  

it seems like an arbitrary level to stop at

2019-07-12 06:11:22 UTC  

A single O'Neill cylinder is waaaaaaay tinier.

2019-07-12 06:11:48 UTC  

What's an O'Neill Cylinder?

2019-07-12 06:12:02 UTC  

The whole idea of a Dyson sphere as a single solid shell is unattainable anyway, we dont have materials that could do that.

2019-07-12 06:12:32 UTC  

Imagine living on the inside of a soda can in space.

2019-07-12 06:13:11 UTC  

oohh okay I've seen some of this

2019-07-12 06:13:30 UTC  

The can is about 20 miles across and it spins on its axis, so there is full gravity at ground level.

2019-07-12 06:14:13 UTC  

It can be pretty much as long as you want, but the diameter is limited by the strength of the shell material. Steel can do about 20 miles.

2019-07-12 06:15:34 UTC  

The 'sky' would be the land on the far side of the can, unless you put a smaller tube inside the bigger one to project a sky onto. But my guess is people would get used to the view pretty quickly.

2019-07-12 06:16:04 UTC  

Anyway it's much, much easier to control the conditions inside one of those than to terraform a whole planet.

2019-07-12 06:16:26 UTC  

Wow I really did break him, this is just getting pathetic now.

2019-07-12 06:16:26 UTC  

JIDF without a doubt

2019-07-12 06:17:27 UTC  

Plus because the gravity is produced by the spin, not by mass, you can make vastly more land area than a planet.

2019-07-12 06:17:40 UTC  

Like billions of times more if I remember correctly.

2019-07-12 06:17:46 UTC  

I gotta be honest, I'm a Christian but I don't believe it's abiblical to think we can expand off of the planet

2019-07-12 06:17:56 UTC  

So the solar system could house trillions of people.

2019-07-12 06:18:00 UTC  

And I used to be a full-blown Kurzweillian

2019-07-12 06:18:07 UTC  

I don't see why it would be.

2019-07-12 06:18:24 UTC  

Takes 'be fruitful and mutliply' and runs with it.

2019-07-12 06:18:29 UTC  

heh

2019-07-12 06:18:46 UTC  

I figure if God has an issue with us expanding off Earth he'll let us know somehow.

2019-07-12 06:18:53 UTC  

Prolly

2019-07-12 06:19:11 UTC  

@Goose what is the basis for picking European as a category, over smaller/larger categories?

2019-07-12 06:19:36 UTC  

I think it's a testament to the more beautiful aspects of our nature that we want to reach

2019-07-12 06:20:01 UTC  

Well, ethnolinguistics and religion, for one

2019-07-12 06:20:36 UTC  

But I believe it's incumbent on Christendom to Christianize all of the Indo-European lands.

2019-07-12 06:20:53 UTC  

Aight I'm out for the night, peace lads. Goose, thank you for sharing your opinions. I'll think on them.

2019-07-12 06:21:05 UTC  

gn yo