Message from @Goose
Discord ID: 607410753984790528
yup, they got tired of us using the bullet button to skirt the law, so they rewrote it to say that you must dissasmble the gun inorder to change magazines
basically its in the definition of what a fixed magazine is.
then they say if you have a detatchable mag and any scary features, then its an assault weapon and you cant buy them.
this was passed two years ago and came into effect last year
The amount of restrictions California is enacting is mind boggling.
I asked a question similar to this in <#586033832277442590> .... interesting....
my dog
my dog
my dog's a good swimmer
there
How is this a difficult question?
Will the stranger fetch my slippers?
if she knows her place she will! 😏
no one said the stranger was male
well thats easy, I'd lock up in terror and they'd both drown
It's a trick question! The person drowning is you and your dog has been trained for water rescue scenarios.
What's the stranger's race?
_Sort of_
🤞
My dog is dead.
So joke is on you I guess?
If I were Italian and it was a migrant trying to get into my country, I'd prolly save my dog
I'd probably save my dog and then try and save the stranger, honestly.
I have a responsibility for my dog.
That's not one of the choices
If it was a kid I would save the kid first though.
Yes it is. "Which one would you save first?"
Not "which one would you save?"
The implications are the other drowns, but nice loophole abuse :)
Generally I believe I have a moral responsibility to the human no matter how much I love my dog, but an invader's an invader
Even if the invader doesn't understand he's an invader
@Nucleon they should have worded it better if they meant that the second one would definitely drown. As it's worded the implication is that there is a chance to save both.
Also Dennis Prager is neo-liberal scum
shouldn't that be neo-con?
They are interchangeable according to goose
They aren't interchangeable. They work in tandem
But yes he's also neo-con scum