And not all right wingers are for nationalisation of social media companies. Im not.

for sure, but it wont stop all of your ring leaders from crying about it. More of a general trend among the grifters

Also did you just say conservatives are fascists?

<:SWEATSTINY:399640604792848400>

it was an example of fascism they use

You gave the example of conservatives when explaining fascism

yea

doesn't make them fascist

depends on how many boxes you check

Trump is doing a good job a checking as many as he can

what are the boxes?

rejection of democracy
arch-individualist
Far-right populism
attacking the media to the point when I have a convo with a conservative and send them an article from a page they don't like they will ignore it
attacking freedom of the press
attacking freedom of speech

"wut? no fascism is putting 'us' at the top of power" Isnt that what the left does? Defining "us" as the working class?

ideally 'working class' would be everyone. But normally it would be a group of people. Also we could add taking away right from minorities to that list above

oh and another good example of giving up on something when it isn't working for you would be Row V Wade for example. That one they are trying to stack the courts for. I thought they loved the consitiution

arch-individualist? Fascism isnt individualist at all. Its all about improving the position of a group/people and everyone even members of that group that stand in the way of this will dealt with in an unkind manner.

What rights has Trump taken away from minorities?

They do love the constitution which is why they want it enforced by stacking the courts with originalists who actually enforce it.

https://transequality.org/the-discrimination-administration

the constitution was meant to be changed

I'll give you the arch individualist one

that was bad

With amendments not by appointing liberal justices. Also you are undermining your previous point. If the constitution was ment to be changed conservatives would be acting accordingly by stacking courts.

and taking away right yes I agree. But also the stacking the courts goes back to my anti democratic statement earlier

obama was blocked by republicans and couldn't fill the seat in the house

removing special protections for transgender people is not taking away their rights. You dont have a right to special treatment just because you claim to be the oposite gender. By removing these protections they are operating by the same rules as all other people. That doesnt sound like its so terrible.

I won't into how anti science that statement was we can go over that later.

Senate republicans dont have to confirm a justice they dont like, just as democrats wanted to block trumps nominees. Nothing wrong with that.

should we remove the rules that protect race?

yes

also they didn't even call a vote btw

they should have

they blocked the vote

exactly

but they should not have confirmed if they didnt want to

ok back on the protections of minorities should we protect remove all protected classes

the reason for blocking the vote was dumb

yes

the reason was for a right leaning justice. Obama even game them a hard centrist

and they still said no

what do you think will happen to southern states if we remove minority protections