Message from @Louis Carlos Fer
Discord ID: 625555356004777985
No such thing
there is such a thing as "fair"
ask Mao
he was super fair
Oof
Pol Pot too. He believed that all men were made fair at the point of birth, and sought to create a society that reflected that.
I read Brother Number One, there is no answers for the crazy that was Pol Pot in there
Maybe he was the most true believer of socialism, everyone is equal when they're dead.
He was much more complex than that. He got rid of money, targeted killing people with glasses, etc
All I know about him is that he took power in Cambodia, tried to bomb his own country back to the Stone age, and killed people for such stupid and petty reasons as to make Che seem pretty reasonable.
I can't help but wonder how he managed to get control in the first place.
Ive been to cambodia, in its peak it had the largest city in the world
He didnt destroy that though, it was a long time ago and it was destroyed when greedy leadership moved the capital to phnom pen
In an effort to increase trade with india and china to import more luxury items
He took power via civil war to institute coommunism and the promises of prosperity associated with it
I was joking a bit, but I do think in some ways he was more true to socialism, and that was the problem.
Also ahould be noted that he orchestrated an ethnic cleansing of the country
we still have fondboy though don't we
But sometimes bad people say good things
GTFO with your "facts"
😏
I'm sorry no gulag pls
Wasn't marx either according to the internet... If you trust the internet
Where the workers are employed by the state, they must arm and organize themselves into special corps with elected leaders, or as a part of the proletarian guard. Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary
https://www.truthorfiction.com/did-ronald-reagan-say-under-no-pretext-should-arms-and-ammunition-be-surrendered/
For a pair of words, my AKSHULLY was outdone. Curse this foul existence
hmm that seems a bit off. the way its worded would let a lefty just say yes. Shouldn't it be something closer to "Islam's solution for Gays is right"
it doesn't fit the format correctly - it needs to be about the left's cognitive dissonance
Wouldn't it just be 'Islam is right about LGBT'?
Why mess with the format at all if it works?
yeah probably best to stick to the established format
Gasp
@Legalize but theres another user named method with a default pic who has not said a word in any chat (according to search). I'd bet methode is still here via a spy
Looks like Monopoly money in hand