Mass murders are high profile when they “could’ve happened to anyone” in my mind. The murder rate is dominated by people killing a single person they know. That’s why high profile mass murders are just a blip regardless of how they’re defined

I would be shocked if the average IQ of all murderers wasn’t between 80 and 90

https://www.cp24.com/news/obama-urges-canadians-to-have-hope-in-a-dark-age-1.4447222

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/minimum-wage-in-bc-increases-to-dollar1385-an-hour-today/ar-AACf421?OCID=ansmsnnews11

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-virginia-beach-shooting-victims-were-veteran-city-employees/

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/senate-spent-66k-ushers-hold-210727855.html

How does one put the Holocaust and Jim Crow in the same sentence? *oh yeah, it's Barrack speaking*

IQ... You keep using that word... It... Does not mean... What... You think it mean.

Anyways, a mass shooting becomes "high profile" if it's profiled, your preference doesn't matter; If the media doesn't want to talk about it, they won't.

Put Barack in any sentence, and suddenly wierd word-shit salads are served.

The term "mass shooting" is largely a shitty metric that the media and many others love to blow out of proportion.

Also, Obama is a meme. Once again, another appraised two faced phony by sheep to the slaughter.

The legal standard for mass shooting is 4 or more dead without other criminal conduct.
¿Don't like it? Take it up with the FBI, they set the standard.

They also changed the standard under Obama.

...
¿Oh?

The Washington Post analysis uses data from Mass Shooting Tracker, a database started by Redditors, and reflects the number of incidents in which four or more people were killed or injured by a shooter (including the shooter).

This stands in contrast with the FBI's definition of a mass shooting, which is one of the most commonly accepted ones: an incident in which three or more people are killed as part of a single shooting, excluding the shooter. (Prior to 2013, that number was four.) That means if 40 people were shot but only two died, the FBI would not consider it a mass shooting — such as the Virginia shooting during a live TV broadcast.

https://mashable.com/2015/12/03/mass-shooting-definition/

I see. *contemptuous sniff*

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-met-mother-killed-protecting-daughter-20190529-story.html

https://apple.news/AIEf5nQmVS9CtPS5NI4E4_w

So because a non indigenous person didn’t lead the investigation . It’s why it failed and not that many of the properly trained people couldn’t find anything.

ya

it's because of the rassism

Hmmmm could the crazy do something crazy in the dem primary https://twitter.com/nbcnews/status/1134958096537870336?s=21

Bernie let it happen to him in 2016 and I think Clinton did as well. Bet this is just the start

The fear that was in her eyes. Man, if we could somehow extract that and put it in a bottle. We might be able to solve a lot of modern problems

Woke Twitter has already warped that into ‘entitled white male has taken mike from black women’

It’s one of your own you intersectional freaks

if you look closely, she handed the mic to him

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/01/milkshaking-matt-gaetz-doused-pensacola/

The guy who took the mic from kamala harris was wearing a shirt that said something about animal rights

So probably a PETA Vegan type person

Lol. Vegans and their lack of behavior control

I think they're missing nutrients that make them crazy

Also, its their own fault (the left) they get crazy people like that because they encouraged their own side to be uncivil like that.

@Agent Smith
This is why I sleep with brass knuckles on. 😠

You wear brass knuckles to bed in case of milkshake attack?

In case of unexpected attack.

That’s a bit paranoid.

Do you live in a bad area or something?

Did mandatory Carry say he lived in calfiornia?

He did at one point

I don’t think so anymore