Message from @A. Spader
Discord ID: 611733797028888649
We wuuz KANGZ
@uncephalized freaked me the fuck out earlier this evening; There is a monumentally exploitable exemption in Daetslov that I fear will be abused no end. I challenged him to name it, and he said *"Contientious Objector."*
I decided I'd better check into this myself; I *could* have missed something.
*"Contentious Objector: Any person who applies for exemption as a contentious objector, having established probable likelihood based on third party sworn affidavit, may receive an exemption."*
That is a bit on the broad side, but it didn't strike me as particularly exploitable- At least, not for money. The chaplain has to face his own mirror, so to lie about something like this for money would take one **HELL** of a jaded person.
Others who *could* potentially submit such sworn statements, and bear in mind lying on a sworn statement makes it *under oath,* wouldn't generally have the werewithal to withstand scrutiny.
While it may well need revision, I'm now relatively confident that the sort who would lie in a sworn statement would lie in most any other situation; They'd even lie and claim the applicant is mentally unstable or *"a general dumbass"* (C and D) if that's what it took.
...
¿What about it?
@Mandatory Carry I think what actually freaked you out was the possibility that I *did* read your bill and *still disagree with it*.
@pokemon_fetish HOLY SHIT how many tabs does that guy have open! seriously, his poor RAM.
pounding the world, like a battering ram
@uncephalized, no, a, you really didn't, and b, yes, it did; "¿A second exploit? ... Don't start on him, skid, he might be onto something..."*
A second exploit? NAY I SAY!
Almost, yes. But most people won't commit felonies for lulz.
But Mandy is different. You know your name here is 3 girl names?
Manda Tory Carrie
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fuck you, that's funny!🤣
...
Let me guess; The fact that I'm laughing (harder than y'all) at the joke (at my expense) scares ya...
¿Close? 😂
@Mandatory Carry why are you so dedicated to the narrative that I would lie about something so trivial as reading a thousand or so words of poorly spelled pseudo-legalese?
Because you didn't.
You read what you *wanted* to read.
Three people here along caught it. You never have, and Leg, I could point it out to him and he'd never accept it. He's too dedicated to the *"wild wild west"* narrative to see what...
Is already there.
Edit: Pink Pistols, when I sent to them, even called in the first line of thier reply... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm sorry what are we arguing about?
@A. Spader
Very long story about people who WON'T read. Or maybe just accept they're wrong... 😔😔😔😔
what is it that people aren't reading?
...
*I'd like to hear what fantasy Leg is gonna tell you.*
Indulge me. 😉
well in the meantime show me the legislation you're proposing
I assume it's a modern take on the Militia Act @Mandatory Carry ?
where can I find the specs?
yeah I'm just seeing facebook posts
with Zucc trying to get me to join his site taking up the entire lower side
alright found it
what are your objections @Legalize beyond the compulsion to carry and own firearms?
https://pastebin.com/xQYwBz1S a simple text version if needed
Was going to add that.
Automatic gun registry built-in.
hmm
seems poorly thought out
how do you enforce this without a registry?
you couldn't
I guess the benefit is every private citizen is armed, but to be honest alot of people are just gonna by a hipoint and stuff it down their pants
Also you can just pay an exorbitant exemption fee (hundreds of dollars a month), meaning that poor people are going to be forced to comply while wealthy people will just get out of it with money if they want.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 @Legalize can't even get the name right... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hey, you finally found it... Months ago.
Oh good, you two STFU, @A. Spader
Please... Continue. This may well be useful
I'm not saying I don't thing they should have guns