Message from @A. Spader
Discord ID: 611740647468302346
@A. Spader
...
No. No tracking system. Every attempt at a smart gun concept has failed.
or even for *using language contrary to the Act*
which means as far as I can tell that he not only wants to enforce everyone's behavior, but also their speech
Hafta block Uncephalized for s bit *so @A. Spader can be heard.*
hahahahahaha
and this is what he does
no one is silencing anybody but you, asshole
If you'd read it you'd know so stop spamming, @Legalize.
who defines what a violent political organization @Mandatory Carry ? They're banned on your list, but I see no definition of what constitutes such a group, or what constitutes membership in said group?
Ok...
Let me look into that, @A. Spader.
I assume this is written with Antifa in mind but it seems like a hanging chad just a bit
Ok, fine. I will work on it.
considering that we had congresspeople comparing the tea party to ISIS
it seems like that would violate the due process we're so up in arms about red flag laws violating
since membership in something like say.....antifa is pretty losely defined nationally
Can confirm, people are retarded, buy HiPoint and mexican carry and shoot their dick off.
Ya... Red flag concept isn't in there for a reason...
@A. Spader, ¿any other observations? Ceph, I will unblock you in a minute.
"Ya... Red flag concept isn't in there for a reason..."
Except for the part where anyone who belongs to a group on the no-no list is automatically banned @Mandatory Carry
even if they haven't committed an actual crime
You keep provisions of the Gun Free School Zones Act (of 1990) in the bill that sort of defeat the point
90% of mass shootings occur in gun free zones
...
I could work on that. You have an idea how maybe?
it seems like if we're arming everyone barring them from schools and courthouses endorses the same logic as gun grabbers
one minute
Nuke the Government.
also when we're talking about liability insurance explain to me the legal ramifications of requiring insurance for cars but banning it for guns?
that is to say, what happens when lawsuits for wrongful death start to roll in?
On the gun free zones thing, as long as everything's categorized you could require a measure of training to carry in 'soft targets' that would be completely optional and subject to more oversight
it's far from perfect but that's probably your best play under the circumstances
Liability insurance is intrinsically racist; The idea of mandated LI for gun owners was ***ONLY*** meant to price blacks, hispanics, and asians out of the market.
I'll definitely consider that "soft target" issue...
Not in Mandatory Carry World
He is a binary thinker.
yes and no. If someone gets in a car wreck when with a senegalize illegal then the american citizen gets f---ed out of the money to buy a new car without insurance. More to the point in an at fault incident there is no way to cover the holpital bills without such provisions
that's the problem here
So if liability insurance is intrinsically racist because minorities are poor, why is it *not* racist to allow a paid exemption from carry @Mandatory Carry ?
@A. Spader
As to the liability insurance issue, I think I addressed that by *Limitations of liability* (section 17);
In short, if you can't be arrested, you can't be sued, either.
does that cover wrongful death/shooting though?
that's what I'm asking
*If you can't be arrested...*
So you're advocating abolishing the concept of wrongful death entirely?