It's too late now

5 years.

Can common law get you a green card?

Im asking for Beeman or Reonen or someone foreign that's all

Not sure

Don't think so

Only with a DV complaint.

Oof it's a joke

Then hang a laughing smiley next time...
🤣🤣🤣🤣

Naw mang

this house wins

They have been since 1986.

Zoomer on Boomer burns

No...
It was sarcastically called the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA), more specifically the Hughes Amendment.

Lots of folks saying they are done with Walmart after their act of social posturing.... that won't do a thing to reduce gun crimes.

I'm sure all the local gun stores are thrilled to hear that they'll be getting more business from people wanting ammo.

True.

Machine guns have been regulated since 1934 and outright banned in 1986

With anything before 1986 being grandfathered
But I have seen videos of automatic weapons being fired that are clearly made after 1986
So I'm not sure if a different sub section for different groups

FFLs can buy new machine guns

(I think)

yeah they get SOT samples

but short of being a SOT machine guns are prohibitively expensive

like expensive car price expensive

@SapperOne here shows the use of the *political,* not technical, term machinegun.

You're one to talk

Yes.
I am. I *litterally* am.

*ON A RELATED NOTE...* 😈😈😈😈
"One should always be wary of a scientist speaking out of his narrow field, or those invoking their name outside their fields. Scientists are human too, and are just as prone to cling to 'causes', just or frivolous, as the rest of our species."
-Dr. Peter WYKOFF WALKER, 1997 (Peter is an aerospace engineer for JPL iirc).
“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
-Dr. Michael CRICHTON, MD (RIP)
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities."
-François-Marie AROUET, 1765

@Fondboy are you saying that mental wellbeing is not a component of wellbeing?

did you listen to my call in?

No, I was commuting

she told me that surveys of well being are not as accurate as suicide rates

for well being

it is a component

but a horrible predictor

I would say that if you say you're doing fine and kill yourself, you probably werent doing so fine. It depends on what the data shows

well here https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/

this data shows an increase of well being

a meta analysis of 73 studies

she hand waved it

Because it's not a neutral source