Drone striking your own civilians is giving up the ghost anyway, I have to imagine some will do the striking sure, but also a lot will defect

but that house looks so fun

Because it's not a neutral source

"The What We Know Project has recently moved to the Center for the Study of Inequality at Cornell University. We are an online research portal that marks a path-breaking convergence of scholarship, public policy and new media technology. Focusing on public policy debates around inequality"

They had their conclusion before their 'metastudy'

And since a metastudy is making a claim about what the research shows, not actual research...

Are you looking at these summaries? First one 'survey via the Internet and on paper", second 'non randomized sample' third '22 participants'

'metastudies' aren't more than whatever the person doing it wants to say, they picked what went in after all

It's as unscientific as you get because you start with the conclusion, not the question

Yeah, I can't grok it

Also, how often does 'was a transgender' get checked in the suicide report

Can anyone really have this number?

The burden of proof is on the people advocating irreversible surgeries

Ok, what proof would look like is if you got a large random sample of transgenders, then half physically transition, and half do psychotherapy, and in ten years there are significantly lower suicides among the transitioners, you actually have a data point

I'm looking, but seeing nothing that looks like actual data points

All that seems sure is that those who go through transitions still have much higher suicide rates than the general population

Data is interpreted, it can be misinterpreted repeatedly, especially since people have a model for incorrect interpretation after the first occurrences

I can't @Clive, you're obviously correct

And by the ascii code later letters have higher values

Therefore n is > h

So true

Ok, bed time for realz, I'll check back for facts tomorrow

Sounds like denial to me

Then again, husband could be happy the ginger took a weight off his back

No no, the boyfriend is the one with the legendary bio

Yup, it's the war of words, they can't call someone a white supremacist (which is the worst thing you can be don't you know) when they're clearly not, but they can call them alt right since it doesn't mean anything, and then just say alt right and white supremacist in the same sentence a lot

This doesn't make sense, he's going off about Matt not defending everyone's right to speech, but that's exactly what Matt does, and Tim Pool as well

It's like, who are you people even talking about, and why are you so mad

Also I don't know what this guy means by 'gate keeping'

Or if he knows what he means