@uncephalized
*"Did you get your nap, @Mandatory Carry?"*
No. Every time I doze off I snap back. 😒

*"I deliberately wrote it that you don't have to carry loaded"
WHY?*
Because some people aren't comfortable with chamber carry; If they don't want to go there, ¿why force it? Hell, I was once one of that crowd.

@A. Spader
Either or. Hell, it's not even like it mandates open or concealed carry; It just prohibits the states from mandating either or from passing *may issue* and *good cause* requirements.

Idk you might add a requirement for ammunition in the magazine. Carrying a firearm without ammo is gonna get you killed

And same. I Israeli carried for the first month I had a ccw

huh, CQC?

...
I *will* work on that issue.
See, *that* is what intelligent argument looks like;
*'This is an issue.'*
**Oh. Damn, that never occurred to me. I mean, you'd think it'd be obvious, but...**

@Beemann I believe 'firearm' is already defined in federal law so presumably Mandy's bill not mentioning it just means firearm means the same thing it means in previous federal statutes with definitions

Which is why I brought up the shoelace

Wait you mean using this to curcumvent the NFA? Gee I hope so

I mean will we be able to circumvent this because of silly ATF decisions

Such as having our fully automatic 14inch shoestrings

Just slip in a little innocuous *"Anyone in compliance with this law shall not be subject to the NFA"*

Or will the Mandy Tory Carrie law also require rigid redefinition of firearms so as not to include outliers or the later inclusion of outliers

Right but I mean for undermining the law

A component that allows for conversion to full auto fire is defined as a machinegun by the ATF

@Legalize based

Which is why they sent out a letter warning about shoestring use in 04

hey man, his bill includes laser guns and energy weapons be grateful

So my belt, being a component in bump firing, is a machinegun

pew pew

I'll just get it registered and away I go

*"I'd like to register this pillow as a form 1 supressor"*

Every American citizen with a bed is not in compliance with the NFA 😎 😎 😎

If I understand it correctly it's sort of dumber than that

See, it's not illegal to own a shoestring, but it's illegal to use your shoestring as a conversion component, so you would need to license your shoestring as a machine gun to use it for that purpose

I think they later changed their decision on the shoestrings, but it could easily happen again

Or could happen with some similarly innocuous item

@A. Spader
It's close enough. A little more latitude for future technologies, though.
Ehem, it treats them all the same, though.

***@Clive WINS!***
Ya, he "got one over on me" (by sniffing out the secret); AR-15 or C-4Ør (rail gun) or Klingon Disruptor, they're all the same for enforcement...
*If that technology ever comes...*
Which it might.

Well if Elon Musk can make a Flamethrower, I'm sure he can make a rifle-sized Railgun

I'll take 2

Fr tho

...
I think flamethrowers are covered...
Maybe...
Not saying it's a great idea, just covered...

Aren't they banned by Genenva convention?

Flamethrowers for snow clearing

The Geneva Convention... 😂

i know i know, but stilll

Geneva convention: bans hollow points
Iron forged bullets: "I'm about to end this man's career"

I think hollow points was the Hague convention

Ahh you right

One of those random facts where I'm always That Guy

idk what you mean

Somebody mentions Geneva and hollow points, then I come in like "WELL AKCHUALLY"