Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 630585760910802985


2019-10-06 22:04:18 UTC  

i have a video with a robot voice that reads a good article but is so shitty that i do not want to send but this teological point checks out with what I believe

2019-10-06 22:05:01 UTC  

i am searching for the article

2019-10-06 22:07:38 UTC  

but good question @DJ_Anuz

2019-10-06 22:09:07 UTC  

I just like stirring thought. Even if it can come across antagonistic lol. That wasn't my intent.

2019-10-06 22:10:59 UTC  

i did find the answer of the video

2019-10-06 22:11:00 UTC  

How do you reconcile Luke 23:43, where Jesus said to one of the thieves on the cross "today you will be with me in paradise," with John 20:17, where we are told that on the third day after His death "I have not yet returned to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God"? In the latter passage, it seems that Christ has not yet gone to paradise.

Theologians have different views as to how this question should be answered. The following is a well-accepted explanation. In Luke 16:22-26, we see that hades (the equivalent of sheol in the Old Testament) is divided into two separate realms: "hell," where the unrighteous go after death; and "paradise" or "Abraham's Bosom," the place of rest for the righteous. The two realms together comprised hades -- though they were separated by a great chasm or gulf that could not be bridged by inhabitants of either side.

Christ descended into the "paradise" compartment of hades when He died (1 Pet. 3:18-20), and when the thief on the cross died he went there too. Thus, the thief was with Christ that day in paradise, yet Christ had not yet ascended into heaven.

When Christ did ascend into heaven (John 20:17), He took the rest of the inhabitants of paradise (i.e., all the Old Testament saints) with Him (Eph. 4:8-9) -- including the thief on the cross. So, there is no contradiction between Luke 23:43 and John 20:17.

2019-10-07 00:22:14 UTC  

*"So instead of 6 poles by 8 sheaves they do 8 sheaves with 6 poles./DESTROYING THE SYMBOLIC NATURE!"*
A msg that can not be decph is not rcvd,
And if you can translate that, you understand why 8×6 is the same as 6×8 to me.

Or perhaps it's if you *CAN'T* "decrp.* 😲

2019-10-07 01:57:02 UTC  

Ponytails are the superior female hairstyle

2019-10-07 01:57:04 UTC  

fite me

2019-10-07 01:57:46 UTC  

explain urself

2019-10-07 02:01:15 UTC  

Ponytails are great for three reasons

2019-10-07 02:01:22 UTC  

1) Practicality

2019-10-07 02:01:35 UTC  

>inb4 too lazy to grab her hair the normal way

2019-10-07 02:01:54 UTC  

The fact that the hair is tied up and out of the way makes activities, especially strenuous ones, much easier to perform

2019-10-07 02:02:01 UTC  

Whether sports, chores, whatever

2019-10-07 02:02:07 UTC  

2) Femininity

2019-10-07 02:02:25 UTC  

Fact that the lady can still have long hair despite the above is _great_

2019-10-07 02:02:30 UTC  

3) Nape exposure

2019-10-07 02:02:36 UTC  

which cunt doesn't like seeing the nape of the neck

2019-10-07 02:02:41 UTC  

I will absolutely fite you irl

2019-10-07 02:05:09 UTC  

Long hair with slight wave, volume and M bangs is best. Don't you want to be enveloped by soft, nice-smelling hair?

2019-10-07 02:05:55 UTC  

See, that is made possible because of the ponytail

2019-10-07 02:06:03 UTC  

She can wear a ponytail at work and keep that hair

2019-10-07 02:06:09 UTC  

instead of having to cut glorious hair

2019-10-07 02:09:47 UTC  

I'm with you there. Long hair is best

2019-10-07 02:12:25 UTC  

Mmmmm

2019-10-07 02:42:37 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz just now got to talk to him and he was pretty tired, but his answer (boiled down to what I can remember and paraphrase) was that it's not impossible, but that when he reads the verse about Mary he has always seen it as more of what you mentioned the modern translations use (clingy). It is interesting though so thanks for bringing it up

2019-10-07 03:00:32 UTC  

@Mandatory Carry the sequence of numbers in Hebrew can drastically alter the symbolic meaning.

2019-10-07 04:06:49 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz...
I didn't know that.

2019-10-07 08:44:14 UTC  

Could fill a book...........

2019-10-07 09:12:11 UTC  

or binders

2019-10-07 09:20:53 UTC  

Was that a Mitt Romney reference?

2019-10-07 10:04:16 UTC  

Not that it matters, no.
It was a cheap shot at me... But it was both true and funny. 😉

2019-10-07 10:30:48 UTC  

lol

2019-10-07 10:30:55 UTC  

It was a Mitt reference

2019-10-07 10:31:11 UTC  

and a cheap shot

2019-10-07 10:31:23 UTC  

Mandatory DM me

2019-10-07 11:05:11 UTC  

Both then. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

2019-10-07 13:00:54 UTC  

hello

2019-10-07 22:05:07 UTC  

@Beemann yesterday I did miss your response to what I said. So God is all powerful yet He is also righteous so He is binded by His own nature to not be tyrannical. And He is perfect and He cannot be with sinners. So it's only ultimately a problem created by God if God create Himself and picked all His attributes