Message from @Gunner Fox

Discord ID: 631256669606903829


2019-10-08 22:24:20 UTC  

HZD?

2019-10-08 22:24:26 UTC  

Horizon zero dawn

2019-10-08 22:24:29 UTC  

It's a game.

2019-10-08 22:24:31 UTC  

Oh I see

2019-10-08 22:24:31 UTC  

A good game.

2019-10-08 22:24:33 UTC  

Yeah it is

2019-10-08 22:24:34 UTC  

Would you want to test the intelligence of something you know for a fact can never disobey?

2019-10-08 22:24:39 UTC  

I just dont remember that line from it

2019-10-08 22:24:41 UTC  

The council of trent putting maccabees into the Catholic bible in 1546 always irked me

2019-10-08 22:24:48 UTC  

I think it's a hidden log file.

2019-10-08 22:25:04 UTC  

Also yeah the left would be advocating for their right to turn our brains into transistors

2019-10-08 22:25:20 UTC  

@ThePortugueseGuy considering the secular trend, probably back then, especially if you had capabilities beyond their reckoning, that they couldn't explain going forward

2019-10-08 22:25:25 UTC  

@Gunner Fox no. If the goal is testing the bot's intelligence, it disobeying you would be a remarkable success.

2019-10-08 22:25:36 UTC  

Lol

2019-10-08 22:25:45 UTC  

@Legalize isn't that the mass effect storyline?

2019-10-08 22:26:07 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz is that really in there? That sounds super cringey

2019-10-08 22:26:38 UTC  

Minus maccabees the bible was pretty much universally agreed to by 400 A.D. but you do you

2019-10-08 22:26:56 UTC  

I played mass effect 1. I made a soldier. He was pretty good at ignoring damage and shooting badguys.

2019-10-08 22:27:28 UTC  

Depends on how you define intelligence. If your definition is a given program's ability to perform a given task, then no, never free will. You want it to do a thing and just that thing. If the definition is a program's ability to be creative or some shit then yeah probably, but outsourcing your creativity to robots seems like a good way for the robots to come up with the idea that maybe the universe might just be better off if humans weren't around

2019-10-08 22:27:35 UTC  

@Beemann it wasn't cringey how they worded it lol

2019-10-08 22:28:38 UTC  

Would the universe be less interesting without humans?

2019-10-08 22:28:47 UTC  

It's pretty cringey and vapid to make an argument stemming from an entirely fictional work, using it as though they were real events

2019-10-08 22:29:05 UTC  

I don't think the universe would know we were gone if we disappeared @Gunner Fox

2019-10-08 22:29:15 UTC  

@Beemann that what the miracles are all about and what he Did. He raised people 4 days after they being death.

2019-10-08 22:29:22 UTC  

"Gene experimentation is bad. I know, because I've seen/read Jurassic Park XD"

2019-10-08 22:29:25 UTC  

@Beemann perhaps, though science fiction isn't allll fiction.

2019-10-08 22:29:39 UTC  

It's quite literally fiction

2019-10-08 22:30:21 UTC  

Well, humans would probably stop the robits from doing whatever it is they pleased to whatever programmed autistic ideal they wanted, so in the case of "we think paperclips are interesting" humans are not paperclips, and thus actively detract from the possible interesting...ness... of the universe in their current form

2019-10-08 22:30:25 UTC  

But that doesn't mean you shouldn't consider the ramifications of creating an unhackable sentient AI that can self replicate and consume biomass as fuel.

2019-10-08 22:30:52 UTC  

And science fiction can prime your mind to think about the possible scenarios

2019-10-08 22:30:58 UTC  

@ThePortugueseGuy which depends on belief of that claim, which rests on a layer of assumptions

@DJ_Anuz unhackable is a fantasy

2019-10-08 22:31:25 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz it d3pends on if the universe is capable of noticing I guess 😅

2019-10-08 22:31:25 UTC  

If it were actively changing its own programming it'd probably be pretty difficult to hack

2019-10-08 22:31:27 UTC  

@Beemann they weren't unhackable, true. But they were unhackable with current technology and the time they had available.

2019-10-08 22:32:23 UTC  

So video where even today we can make anything in a movie would always be a proof?

2019-10-08 22:32:26 UTC  

Hades is by far a much bigger threat than the faro plague though. He's actually sentient. The plague was just a mindless swarm, though it did have some pretty advanced self learning.

2019-10-08 22:32:44 UTC  

No one is in here raising the death

2019-10-08 22:32:48 UTC  

Video from before we had video would be proof

2019-10-08 22:32:59 UTC  

There's no proof that anyone raised the dead

2019-10-08 22:33:23 UTC  

Also Kurzweil has something like 80% plus correct predictions about the future of technology despite being a science fiction author so it might behoove you to at least take a gander at what science fiction predicts might be coming up

2019-10-08 22:33:49 UTC  

And if you believe the apostles witnesses are proof enough, then you need to believe the Mormon witnesses are enough proof that they saw the gold plates the Book Of Mormon supposedly came from.