Okay, so real question: Why are they saying Matt doesn't defend free speech because he defends it generally instead of every specific individual account?

Did you listen to the clip?

They think he wouldn't defend people lile Andrew Anglin because he has hateful opinions, so they're basically calling him a coward/hypocrite.

They're just wrong, hopefully he will set them straight.

This isn't the first time they've done shit like this.

Half of me wonders if they're stupid, hthe otherhalf thinks they do it for the extra views from the audience of the people they attack

I'm about 30 minutes in watching the clip. Yeah, they're just wrong, but we think that because we say a wide open general defense of free speech encompasses all individuals, even hateful ones. It's probably not a convincing argument to people who think you have to enumerate every individual account.

yea they just don't know matt's views honestly

It's a leftist-style argument. I compare it to saying you can't claim you're an ally unless you call out every letter of the LGBT acronym.

They just need to look at the superchats and stfu. Manufactured controversy

he's such an ardent free speech advocate and they totally looked over that, irrespective of individual cases

so should we watch for matt or not patronize fake controversy?

The wholer reason they do this shit is so people talk about them

they have matt on and pullin some percentage of the audience.

I highly doubt they actually thought Styx was a pedo when they were saying that about him.

@coochie monsta I probably won't listen to the whole thing. I only ever engage from the audio platforms anyway

Don't waste your time.

RotC is trash.

they're probably gonna come to an agreement really fast anyway

This doesn't make sense, he's going off about Matt not defending everyone's right to speech, but that's exactly what Matt does, and Tim Pool as well

It's like, who are you people even talking about, and why are you so mad

Also I don't know what this guy means by 'gate keeping'

Or if he knows what he means

That term "gatekeeping" in this context was lost on me as well. They seem really angry about subjects they don't research very well. I could only take a few minutes of their incessant ranting.

You have an alcoholic wet back and a pill popping potato nigger.

Your expectations should not be that high...

The closest I've ever seen Matt come to 'not defending free speech' is when he says I don't know anything about that, so I'm not going to comment, which is pretty clearly not the same thing.

Oh...?

I can think of a fe

w other instances.

Mersh and Royce are youtube cancer. A couple of edgy fuckwits who pass themselves off as "True Conservatives" all the while claiming that everyone who isn't a light-fascist (Mersh's exact words) like them, is a LARPer, working for the jews, and they hate our country.

Fuck both of those faggots.

You know you're a couple of talentless hacks when your biggest claim to fame is trolling another talentless hack as he slowly loses his mind.

which talentless hack?

Owen Benjamin

That's how I and a lot of people first heard about ROTC. They spent the vast majority of 2018 on a trolling campaign against the Bear cult.

Anyone got a link to the clip of ROTC smearing Matt? I can't find it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyJtelp-1ec&feature=youtu.be&t=1219

"Not my cup of tea."

Why, cuz Matt isn't a closeted cock sucker with a fake rasp he adds to his voice to make him sound more badass?

They have nothing to say. Nothing at all. They don't actually criticize anything he says in the video.