Message from @Nic Harvard
Discord ID: 536900514692988948
You can't make men leap over the trench of they don't fear you and dishonor more than the machine guns.
Yes it is, but towards what end? Just for yourself?
Acting in an objective, analytical way for the good of the group is a positive NEUTER trait, note
I'm talking purely in military terms.
Meh, Stalin tried that in the early fourties, didn’t work
That's all I've known no sonce I was 16
*17 and 9 months
I only did seven years. And probably in a different army to you;)
Probably but if it was an Anglosphere it's all based off British
Yurp
Which m and it's the same head fuck
*means
Oh I know;)
But you don’t walk into fire because you fear your NCO. You do it because you respect them and love your brothers in arms.
And fear losing that more than death
That’s ultra positive neuter, with a bit of positive masculine thrown in
You don't fight for the "cause" you fight for the man beside you.
Kind of like going “my kids don’t exist or are not here, but if they were and I wasn’t, this is how I Hope their mates act”
^^ and absolutely
It all comes back to the Greek plants tree's proverb.
What was you unit Nic?
Well, yes, that’s one great example
SADF, signals core, cpt, varied units and roles. From group and bttn sigs Officer to regimental signaller instructor/CO, to LRPs/FOBs
Anyway, it pretty much comes down to figuring out if a trait benefits your family. If it does, it’s positive.
Screw anyone else who gets in a snit.
If it stops you from starting one, or looking after it (OR IT’s SURROGATE) then it’s toxic
Just add the fact that throughout history, a fair proportion of people have not been able to have kids of their own.... bit of a “Eureka!” Moment there.... I mean, not many people have been burnt at the stake for being childless
Although a distressing large number of those doing such burnings do appear to have been.
🤔
A good deal if what you said Nic does not work.
We don't have a 3rd sex, and being physically intimidating and threatening isn't in itself toxic, neither is being controlling. These come down to how people use them (and yes i know you said, "for your own benefit", but that still wouldn't make it inherently toxic).
We have neuters surely? And always have
Observe the cunning way the evil pro-life witch gaslights hubby after things got a bit too frisky with Ahmed, and things went a bit too full frontal for once...
Probably has a pre-nup and he’s loaded
I'm not sure why you call people neuters, but that's cool.
So what you seem to class as neuters, this still does not make a 3rd sex.
It would be like calling an Asexual another sex (if they are real), some how playing a role in passing on genes. But they wont......So they aren't another sex.
And haven't you heard? A fully white couple can have black babies.............
Gender and Race are just social constructs.
Dude... that was my link and the point
Chick got preggers with someone else’s kid.... path of least reassurance/resist?
In other news, the Ben Shapiro Show won best news podcast of the year at the iHeart Radio podcast awards. Not a huge deal, but at least it shows someone on the right getting national recognition from a mainstream outlet.
Also, it give Matt and Blonde a good target to shoot for 😁😁😁 lol
I think it is more to do with fewer choices on the right. on the left you have hundreds of news choices , but on the right? names how many podcasts we have? how many are run by people who don't advertise for old folks homes?
Also Ben Shapiro is a huge shill for the GOP establishment so he's not really a good ally except on the most extreme issues (transgenderism, etc)
he is a moderately more Conservative bill kristol.
Yep. He seems popular because he represents the losing-with-dignity crowd that Leftists love so much