Message from @Putz
Discord ID: 589235851771510795
I need more Canadians to cite outside of Bernier, Dallaire and Peterson
Fair enough
can't you also claim gavin, lauren chen and crowder?
I've got a real question for y'all. If you take the basic generic position of today's liberal party and the generic position of today's Republican party how much do you agree with from each party?
I find it weird that so many Republicans agree with 90% of the Republican party's views
Same for liberals agreeing with 90% of the Democrat party's views
What I'm really wondering is how leftists do almost nothing I agree with. You'd think their for free speech and no hormones for prepubescent children and the wage gap is a myth etc
Seems like pretty fucking simple stuff to me, no abortions after the first trimester etc.
How come they're so far gone?
I just find it weird that I agree with them on almost nothing
Even stuff that Republicans haven't told me to believe
Yknow?
Do I make any sense?
Because there is really only two world views. One of personal responsibility and one of victimhood. One where you view all the wrongs and rights in your life being based on your actions and one where circumstance is the main influence and those cicumstances must be corrected by society
Hormones for children is an effect of being born in the wrong body and science and society has the ability and therefore the responsibility to correct it
The logic can be applied to any principal and therefore your world view determines positions
And that's why its so hard to get people to listen or hear your side, you are literally looking at the same picture from different angles
Its very weird how they agree with each other on almost everything and we agree with each other on almost everything
How theres so few people that are pro abortion, pro socialized healthcare and education but also pro gun
Or vice versa, very few people are prolife pro privatized healthcare and education but anti gun
I think many people who are currently antinsocialized healthcare would be for it if it didn't include abortion or birth control
If obamacare didnt include birth control it would have pulled in a lot more support on the right
The challenge is in a two party system you can't see the variations in idealogy and people are defensive so they will not concede a single position for fear it will be used against them
Republicans and i don't see eye to eye on everything. And i don't align to democrats with almost anything. Im closer to libetarian but i can't buy into the open border nonsense
You can be libertarian without being open borders
It's just that there's not much reason to spend on borders when there's no gibs to incentivize migratioj
we were talking about how neatly fit into two categories
@Just for youtube [NB1]
I am a Minarchist (no, not a dirty damned libertarian, a Minarchist). Even in MandatryCarry, I acknowledge ***VERY REAL AND NECESSARY*** limitations (not ***NEARLY*** as many as some, including it seems the NRA and most pro-Second youtubers [ONLY Militry Arms Channel and IV8888 seem more extreme than me]).
So, in a very real sense, I agree with both about a lot of things, but I disagree with both about just as much.
🆙 | **Mandatory Carry leveled up!**
Gee, thanx Tatsumaki. ¿Can we get rid of that obnoxious (multiple expletives)?
my position varies by level of government, federally I'm probably most closely aligned to the constitution party, but often vote libertarian because it has an actual candidate and is closer to my ideology than other candidates. I trend much closer to republican locally
"A 6-year-old from India died after crossing the US-Mexico border. More Indians are making that journey"
What the fuck. Build. The. Goddamn. Wall.
That’s extreme.
And obnoxious
Me or the article?
The article
I agree.
The left is encouraging this crap with their open borders rhetoric
And if we protected our border, people wouldn't be bringing their children to the other side of the planet to die in my desert.