me and legalize are hosting it on the clips channel

@Myth do you think Portland is a possibility for take over because it has a port?

@Myth that’s my guess

Call in show will be hosted on the clips channel tonight by me and legalize https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSAWi5C8HgD8rDfUir0xDBw?view_as=subscriber

Bitchute works because it's crowdhosted

@Peachpanther your thoughts?

Vid.me failed because hosting and serving all that data is the real killer

@Peachpanther a little

I'd be down to take it over less for the port. I'm more into land myself so yea, let's.

@Peachpanther the reason I think it because if the bad protest people took it they get supplies from foreign investors

It's a mostly peaceful city friend.

@Peachpanther lol

@Legalize hello

@Legalize please no

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GADZ46VXmtU&feature=share

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fuyaC8pOwk&feature=share

oh this your video

Does Matt not think political violence can be justified??????????????????????????????

his new video seems to imply that

Being the one to initiate violence is bad, yes

<:PepeLaugh:565528391336329216>

american revolution?

americas several wars over seas

idk america seems built on hitting first

But muh NAP

?

ohh

is this idea for oppressive stances?

if you see a group of people getting larger and larger in their ideas and they want to take your rights away do you wait for them to do it?

or is the rally itself an act of agression before hand? If not do you then attack your government after the law in implemented while it is already too late?

Depends on how you draw the line on conspiracy, I guess.

conspiracy?

I don't think the views of far right groups are very secret

` An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.`
Yes, conspiracy

Whether it's secret or not doesn't matter

google and merriam webster have different deffinition

for conspire

a secret agreement

or to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreemnet

The general idea is that you shouldn't be the one to escalate from "thoughts" to violence. Advocating for something that others find objectionable isn't cause for violence, but trying to act upon that advocacy could be.
The revolution was fought because the British government was enforcing laws the colonists considered unjust.
I can't speak for the overseas wars because I'm against those.
Plenty of politicians have advocated removing my speech rights, but that alone doesn't justify murdering them

@Deleted User is pointing out a real problem with the NAP mindset--the opposition doesn't reciprocate.

Also, the legal definition of conspiracy is different from the dictionary definition and doesn't require secrecy.

@C1PHER I would consider gun confiscation, for instance, a legitimate cause for political violence.