or would this be the sodomy charge?

the judge is giving a range for sentencing

It'd be tge sodomy charge. But how many joe schmoes would know the difference and not just think rape?

It was the same judge who okayed the trial to continue after disproving the original claim.

Impartial was not in his vocabulary.

Could you request a different judge? I feel like there would be some sort of conflict of interest? (Sorry, I'm no lawyer haha)

When I got the 7 year setence. He made sure to tell me that he wished he could sentence me to a more strict punishment.

the jury would be instructed on what burden is required to determine guilt for that charge.

ignorance of sodomy vs rape isnt really an issue for the jury

the prosecution can always amend charges

thats normal

I tried fir a change of venue, but it was determined that there wasn't a conflict of interest.

Trump got impeached?

what?

no

I really doubt it.

But I wouldn't be surprised if it comes to that.

Unless if it's some speaker claiming it cause that's what they do.

The house grandstanding and virtue signaling all day was vile, I could not watch it. Is it over.. did they pass it?

I hope so

If it is, then it's just a guarantee to impeach the next democratic president caise he's a dem.

we need to get this president that won by a technicality out of office.

Hillary won the popular vote.

If they pass it to the Senate it's actually a good thing, can call witness now in a fair manner and expose all the Dem/FBI corruption.

You're forgetting the part where we hold this illegitimate _"president"_ accountable

Jesus @LilMac if your story is as you say that is horrendous

I can imagine looking down the barrel of 45 years hard time

Maybe I'm just ignorant to the finer details of politics, but I don't see how it got past the "we have a witness but you're not allowed to ask questions" portion.

And deciding 7 years is better

Nadler makes the rules

don't like that Nanananananaanananana

My story is up to however you decide to take it. I can't do anything to sway people's opinions of me one way or the other. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah I get that and it’s not easy to come out with something like that

Try and get on the call in show

@LilMac yeah but your story of hearsay isn't really accurate since you took a plea deal

once you plea, you plea... if all they had was that and you went to trial and were still convicted then you could say you were convicted on hearsay

Call in show, maybe. Still kinda on the fence about putting it out there. Just don't want people showing up on my doorstep or where I work.

then be vague, and don't give the state, although you already did that.. 😛

court records are public records

Alright, so convicted on hearsay maybe not. But alleged, charged, tried, and sat in jail for 13 months over hearsay has kinda soured me a bit.

That sound more accurate?