Message from @LilMac

Discord ID: 657018549650325504


2019-12-19 00:31:32 UTC  

Cause not allowed to have or use a razor. So no shaving. Even if you've got to "look your best".

2019-12-19 00:31:46 UTC  

that is the important part where you can remove potential jurors who would view you unfavorably

2019-12-19 00:31:54 UTC  

True, but I'd still be risking 45 yeats.

2019-12-19 00:32:15 UTC  

its a risk worth taking

2019-12-19 00:32:19 UTC  

I can't know how the people going in would think things through.

2019-12-19 00:32:20 UTC  

45 years is insane with that little of evidence

2019-12-19 00:32:41 UTC  

i doubt they would sentence you to that long

2019-12-19 00:32:49 UTC  

for one count of rape?

2019-12-19 00:33:13 UTC  

Raping a child is always worse though.

2019-12-19 00:33:14 UTC  

or would this be the sodomy charge?

2019-12-19 00:33:34 UTC  

the judge is giving a range for sentencing

2019-12-19 00:34:01 UTC  

It'd be tge sodomy charge. But how many joe schmoes would know the difference and not just think rape?

2019-12-19 00:34:47 UTC  

It was the same judge who okayed the trial to continue after disproving the original claim.

2019-12-19 00:35:04 UTC  

Impartial was not in his vocabulary.

2019-12-19 00:36:12 UTC  

Could you request a different judge? I feel like there would be some sort of conflict of interest? (Sorry, I'm no lawyer haha)

2019-12-19 00:36:19 UTC  

When I got the 7 year setence. He made sure to tell me that he wished he could sentence me to a more strict punishment.

2019-12-19 00:36:35 UTC  

the jury would be instructed on what burden is required to determine guilt for that charge.

2019-12-19 00:36:46 UTC  

ignorance of sodomy vs rape isnt really an issue for the jury

2019-12-19 00:37:03 UTC  

the prosecution can always amend charges

2019-12-19 00:37:06 UTC  

thats normal

2019-12-19 00:37:09 UTC  

I tried fir a change of venue, but it was determined that there wasn't a conflict of interest.

2019-12-19 00:37:39 UTC  

Trump got impeached?

2019-12-19 00:38:27 UTC  

what?

2019-12-19 00:38:29 UTC  

no

2019-12-19 00:38:37 UTC  

I really doubt it.

2019-12-19 00:38:59 UTC  

But I wouldn't be surprised if it comes to that.

2019-12-19 00:40:00 UTC  

Unless if it's some speaker claiming it cause that's what they do.

2019-12-19 00:40:07 UTC  

The house grandstanding and virtue signaling all day was vile, I could not watch it. Is it over.. did they pass it?

2019-12-19 00:41:11 UTC  

I hope so

2019-12-19 00:41:15 UTC  

If it is, then it's just a guarantee to impeach the next democratic president caise he's a dem.

2019-12-19 00:41:24 UTC  

we need to get this president that won by a technicality out of office.

2019-12-19 00:41:29 UTC  

Hillary won the popular vote.

2019-12-19 00:43:02 UTC  

If they pass it to the Senate it's actually a good thing, can call witness now in a fair manner and expose all the Dem/FBI corruption.

2019-12-19 00:43:41 UTC  

You're forgetting the part where we hold this illegitimate _"president"_ accountable

2019-12-19 00:43:51 UTC  

Jesus @LilMac if your story is as you say that is horrendous

2019-12-19 00:44:45 UTC  

I can imagine looking down the barrel of 45 years hard time

2019-12-19 00:44:46 UTC  

Maybe I'm just ignorant to the finer details of politics, but I don't see how it got past the "we have a witness but you're not allowed to ask questions" portion.

2019-12-19 00:45:09 UTC  

And deciding 7 years is better

2019-12-19 00:45:11 UTC  

Nadler makes the rules

2019-12-19 00:45:16 UTC  

don't like that Nanananananaanananana

2019-12-19 00:46:17 UTC  

My story is up to however you decide to take it. I can't do anything to sway people's opinions of me one way or the other. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯