Message from @Unironic Ohio Supremecist

Discord ID: 657291795067043844


2019-12-19 18:39:39 UTC  

porn being debated in a video channel. Interesting.

2019-12-19 18:39:48 UTC  

No debate assumes that both sides have a point. With this, One side is correct, and the other side is fucking retarded

2019-12-19 18:39:49 UTC  

@MechMage I know, it's more people telling at eachother.

2019-12-19 18:40:05 UTC  

Telling at each other. I like it.

2019-12-19 18:40:24 UTC  

@GoGoGadgetWang1
Agreed. Your addiction has made you retarded.

2019-12-19 18:40:30 UTC  

Pfft, dedicated chat rooms never work.

2019-12-19 18:40:58 UTC  

the thing is at its core it's a debate between liberty and authority, are you justified to dictate what another does with their body/time/money if it doesn't harm you?

2019-12-19 18:41:00 UTC  

Isn't there a Styx vs E. Michael Jones porn debate sometime this week?

2019-12-19 18:41:19 UTC  

so Styx is pro I'm guessing

2019-12-19 18:41:27 UTC  

That's why it's not a debate. If you're arguing against liberty and constitutional rights, you're retarded

2019-12-19 18:41:31 UTC  

lol

2019-12-19 18:41:45 UTC  

Styx is consistently pro-degeneracy, yeah.

2019-12-19 18:41:45 UTC  

we have a constitutional right to porn?

2019-12-19 18:41:46 UTC  

If a connection between pornography and tangible external harm could be demonstrated the liberty vs authority angle wouldn't matter.

2019-12-19 18:41:55 UTC  

@Lord Zedd They are claiming there is harm though.

2019-12-19 18:42:07 UTC  

but not proving it

2019-12-19 18:42:19 UTC  

Something something societal issues.

2019-12-19 18:42:34 UTC  

and you'd have to prove that it's more severe than the harm caused by any other action

2019-12-19 18:42:37 UTC  

I can claim Kevin makes rational points, but the evidence suggests otherwise. So they can claim all day, doesn't make it so

2019-12-19 18:42:45 UTC  

like video games, gambling, watching movies, coffee

2019-12-19 18:42:55 UTC  

@GoGoGadgetWang1
Lol. Except the people who wrote/ratified the Constitution agree with me.

2019-12-19 18:43:13 UTC  

Which means... you're admitting you're retarded.

2019-12-19 18:43:23 UTC  

@GoGoGadgetWang1 that's your take? That to publish/view porn is a constitutional right?

2019-12-19 18:43:58 UTC  

No but in order to enforce a ban, you'd have to violate parts of the 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th

2019-12-19 18:44:07 UTC  

Nope.

2019-12-19 18:44:09 UTC  
2019-12-19 18:44:16 UTC  

that's the supreme court's take

2019-12-19 18:44:17 UTC  

We just have to prosecute pornographers.

2019-12-19 18:44:19 UTC  

Because you're going to have to look in everyone's computers to confiscate it. Go through people's home

2019-12-19 18:44:38 UTC  

Lol. No.

2019-12-19 18:44:48 UTC  

How would it be any different from going to someone's house and watching them bang if everyone is on board?

2019-12-19 18:44:53 UTC  

but anyone with a phone could be a pornographer

2019-12-19 18:45:12 UTC  

so where is such a right? is it in freedom of speech, or freedom of the press?

2019-12-19 18:45:24 UTC  

Teens do get charged with producing child porn for sexting.

2019-12-19 18:45:37 UTC  

>you can't make something illegal without kicking down everyone's doors

2019-12-19 18:45:56 UTC  

Weird... I thought lots of things were illegal...

2019-12-19 18:46:43 UTC  

Yet my door has never been kicked in...

2019-12-19 18:46:50 UTC  

Freedom of speech. Porn, whether printed or filmed, is an art form. You may not like that art, but it is. Paintings and films are speech (or the contents thereof anyway). Porn would be no different. Just because it's people fucking and you don't like that people enjoy watching people fucking doesn't make it not speech.

2019-12-19 18:47:21 UTC  

@JetPuffed
Except...
James Madison disagreed with you.

2019-12-19 18:47:22 UTC  

And the supreme court has ruled on this. So you're, by definition, wrong.

2019-12-19 18:47:27 UTC  

Are you sure painting are speech? They're expression but I'm not sure that's the same thing.