@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0

beautiful

@Deleted User Be my Guattari

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0

@Windle @「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 @Deleted User @David the Communist @Wix Good night.

@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 https://academic.oup.com/cpe/article-abstract/38/1/1/5505409?redirectedFrom=fulltext

@Nick Lyston gn ❤

@Windle

Good mornyan everynyan! Please be nice to eagles

fuck u americuck

Bird up!

methode that pfp XD

what?

you you know what its from? XD

cuz i know

XD

yeah a hentai

@Deleted User you can't drop anime?

sou said that right

how you doing that

i still haven't wahtched the last 5 eps form fate apo xD

i always leave them xD

https://mises.org/library/error-equilibrium-and-equilibration-austrian-price-theory @Windle @「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 ''Economic theorists working within the broad Mengerian
tradition conceive of the actual market prices realized in clock
time as being market-clearing in nature. These prices thrown up
by the exchange process undertaken in real world markets are said
to establish momentary equilibria, with an equality of the quantities demanded and supplied and an exhaustion of all potential
gains from trade. This view contrast sharply with those of the
economists comprising the neoclassical mainstream, who instead
view realized prices as disequilibrium prices, with a prevailing
inequality of supply and demand.'' this an austrian that describes why every price is a market clearing price or equilibrium prices

@Windle it was from the previous convo when we were talking about why austrians

think every price is an equilibrium price

s?help

stats server

s?stats server

^graph

''Formulated succinctly, Frege’s argument for arithmetic-object platonism proceeds as follows:

i. Singular terms referring to natural numbers appear in true simple statements.

ii. It is possible for simple statements with singular terms as components to be true only if the objects to which those singular terms refer exist.

Therefore,

iii. the natural numbers exist.

iv. If the natural numbers exist, they are abstract objects that are independent of all rational activities.

Therefore,

v. the natural numbers are existent abstract objects that are independent of all rational activities, that is, arithmetic-object platonism is true.'' https://www.iep.utm.edu/mathplat/#SSH2aii

@Windle

https://philpapers.org/rec/RUSLOR there is an argument for logical platonism here

as well