@Deleted User you can't drop anime?

sou said that right

how you doing that

i still haven't wahtched the last 5 eps form fate apo xD

i always leave them xD

https://mises.org/library/error-equilibrium-and-equilibration-austrian-price-theory @Windle @「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 ''Economic theorists working within the broad Mengerian
tradition conceive of the actual market prices realized in clock
time as being market-clearing in nature. These prices thrown up
by the exchange process undertaken in real world markets are said
to establish momentary equilibria, with an equality of the quantities demanded and supplied and an exhaustion of all potential
gains from trade. This view contrast sharply with those of the
economists comprising the neoclassical mainstream, who instead
view realized prices as disequilibrium prices, with a prevailing
inequality of supply and demand.'' this an austrian that describes why every price is a market clearing price or equilibrium prices

@Windle it was from the previous convo when we were talking about why austrians

think every price is an equilibrium price

s?help

stats server

s?stats server

^graph

''Formulated succinctly, Frege’s argument for arithmetic-object platonism proceeds as follows:

i. Singular terms referring to natural numbers appear in true simple statements.

ii. It is possible for simple statements with singular terms as components to be true only if the objects to which those singular terms refer exist.

Therefore,

iii. the natural numbers exist.

iv. If the natural numbers exist, they are abstract objects that are independent of all rational activities.

Therefore,

v. the natural numbers are existent abstract objects that are independent of all rational activities, that is, arithmetic-object platonism is true.'' https://www.iep.utm.edu/mathplat/#SSH2aii

@Windle

https://philpapers.org/rec/RUSLOR there is an argument for logical platonism here

as well

^graph

’’understood as issuing from the picture on which the proper subject of ontological investigation is existence in a privileged metaphysical sense – fundamental, or
real, or deep, whatever it may be. The philosopher who engages in such a project needs
to at least supply some reason to believe that a language expressing such a sense of ‘exists’ could be acquired. In the absence of any such reason there must be a concern that it
is not possible to say, nor to think, that anything exists in the Serious Ontologist’s sense.
This being so, the question, asked by him, ‘what exists?’ is not meaningful; nor – more
to the point – is ‘What exists in the sense ‘exists’ would have in a joint-carving variant
of English?’. The complaint is not that the Serious Ontologist has no justification for any
particular answer to this question. Serious Ontologists themselves generally concede as
much and content themselves with sketching toy theories, outling possible ways the world
could be. Rather, before we even get to the stage of limning the fundamental furniture of
the universe, actual or possible, the enquiry is out of order, since it is not addressing an
intelligible question. Even the perfunctory Quinean response ‘everything’ would be out of
order in this context, since there is no question to which it is the answer.’’ http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120406/1/IfAnOntologistCouldSpeak.pdf @Windle

s?stats voice

s?help

s?stats server

^graph

nice

I mean the server isn't finished

So I've only invited people I thought needed to be invited

https://www.g2a.com/en-us/age-of-wonders-planetfall-steam-key-global-i10000171871013?aid=12169276&___currency=USD&er=eab6647657de1864dbc35dc7c1ed5cea&___language=en-us&adid=GMC_USA-Smart-MEDIUM&id=14&gclid=Cj0KCQjw8svsBRDqARIsAHKVyqFI4pUTOIbLrz6JpK4Fhw2lwcFx7hfw7Z3IfICiPU5FC1_eOnAo6ukaAulGEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds @Marcdoof

https://www.g2a.com/en-us/insurgency-steam-key-global-i10000001741008 @Marcdoof