It sounded like you were skeptical to something about the normalcy of having children or the morality of it

I was curious on the naturalistic fallacy

Oh yeah... the naturalistic fallacy and the is/ought gap are basically one and the same

You can't get from "It is good to live" to "You ought to live" through reason alone

sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States

anti-natalism gang <:PEPELAUGH:643817011117424708>

@muhahahahe you online?

mmh

what up?

@Scrambled Eggs https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/10/06/bertrand-russell-oswald-mosley/

The death grip

Lol

Economy of scale

@Tbg1203 Unironically, it's cheaper more efficient to have homeless in places where it's easier to get goods to them

Urban areas

Yeah

I don't have the exact reasoning, but this is one possible reason

Communist boi has down stats on this

It's cheaper to have them closer to the services

What's the relevance of 125?

66 is the delorian

Or 68 mph

I don't even know where these memes went

Yeah, this is ... obvious / basic economics of comparative advantage

It is cheaper to live in certain locales
If you wanted to care for your homeless, it seems wisest to move them into one of the cheapest locales

However... this naturally leads to the counter argument that you're gentrifying

Which... has a bad history

Tangential meme on concentration camps though... I'd agree to basically any semantic name like calling the detainment camps of Mexicans at our border such... I just don't know what conditions it actually entails

I've heard it's shit at our Mexican border though... people starving, no food, shower, water, etc

So no basic needs met

https://www.goodsmile.info/en/product/5403/THP+01+TOA+HEAVY+INDUSTRIES+Communication+Terminal+Model+20+Kai+Black.html

@actual_communist_boi cummy boi, where is it cheapest to concentration camp the homeless? <:Smug:643129431434461194>

Modest Proposal up in here

...

What a frightening question

@L.A.IN Don't ever compare me to Bent